Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Basic features of biomedical assays.

D R Bangham1

  • 1National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, South Mimms, U.K.

Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry
|January 8, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

H.H. Dale and the London Centre for WHO standards--some milestones of the early years.

Developments in biological standardization·2000
Same author

Assays for human growth hormones.

Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis·1989
Same author

World Health Organization International Standards for highly purified human, porcine and bovine insulins.

Journal of biological standardization·1988
Same author

Safety and the therapeutic protein products made by genetic engineering.

British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·1988
Same author

The International Standard for Human Growth Hormone for Bioassay: calibration and characterization by international collaborative study.

Molecular and cellular endocrinology·1985
Same author

Interim report of results from an international collaborative study of the Proposed International Reference Preparation of porcine pancreatic kininogenase.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·1983
Same journal

The significance of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) for oral anticoagulant therapy.

Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry·2010
Same journal

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in clinical chemistry: the present and the future.

Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry·1998
Same journal

Aging and oxidative stress.

Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry·1998
Same journal

Use of antioxidants in the prevention and treatment of disease.

Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry·1998
Same journal

What is the most accurate, cost-effective way to diagnose acute viral hepatitis?

Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry·1998
Same journal

Monoclonal gammapathies.

Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry·1997
See all related articles

This review highlights the common protein-binding principles underlying diverse biomedical assays. Understanding these fundamental interactions aids in assay selection and result interpretation across disciplines.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical science
  • Analytical chemistry
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Most biomedical assays rely on protein-binding interactions.
  • Ligand-ligator interactions are fundamental to assay mechanisms.
  • Diverse scientific disciplines utilize unique assay methods and units.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the advantages and limitations of various assay types.
  • To identify common principles across different biomedical assays.
  • To enhance understanding and interpretation of assay results.

Main Methods:

  • Review of long-term bioassays.
  • Analysis of in vitro cell-free assays.
  • Focus on protein-binding systems.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Protein-binding is a universal aspect of biomedical assays.
  • Different assay types have distinct strengths and weaknesses.
  • Variations in assay methods can lead to differing results.

Conclusions:

  • A unified understanding of protein-binding assays benefits all scientific disciplines.
  • Knowledge of common assay principles improves assay selection.
  • Clarifying assay mechanisms aids in interpreting divergent results.