Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating software for the clinical laboratory.

K R Gordon1, S M Kutt

  • 1School of Allied Health Sciences, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912.

Clinical Laboratory Science : Journal of the American Society for Medical Technology
|February 8, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experimental perturbation of the development of sexual size dimorphism in the mouse skeleton.

Growth, development, and aging : GDA·1994
Same author

Adaptive modeling in a mammalian skeletal model system.

Growth, development, and aging : GDA·1993
Same author

Experimental changes in mineral content of juvenile mouse femora.

Calcified tissue international·1992
Same author

Technology update: computer-assisted video instruction in hospitals.

Topics in health record management·1990
Same author

Structural alterations and breaking strength of mouse femora exposed to three activity regimens.

Bone·1989
Same author

Guidelines for evaluating medical record software.

Journal (American Medical Record Association)·1988
Same journal

Evaluation of Diverse Health Professionals' Learning Experience in a Continuing Education Activity for Quality Practices in Molecular Genetic Testing.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2019
Same journal

Guidelines for Initiating a Research Agenda: Research Design and Dissemination of Results.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2015
Same journal

Guidelines for Initiating a Research Agenda: Topic Selection and Evidence of Impact.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2015
Same journal

Autonomy and Privacy in Clinical Laboratory Science Policy and Practice.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2015
Same journal

The Value of Clinical Laboratory Sciences Research.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2015
Same journal

From Technical Assistants to Critical Thinkers: From World War II to 2014.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2015
See all related articles

This guide provides essential software evaluation guidelines for laboratory professionals. Implementing a structured process ensures the selection of laboratory software that meets specific needs and avoids technical issues.

Area of Science:

  • Laboratory Science
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Laboratory professionals increasingly manage software evaluation for patient testing and administrative functions.
  • User expertise is crucial for selecting appropriate laboratory software.
  • The need for standardized software evaluation procedures in laboratories is growing.

Framework:

  • Presents guidelines for structuring the software evaluation process.
  • Emphasizes selecting software that aligns with laboratory requirements.
  • Outlines critical evaluation steps: documentation review, software testing, standards comparison, and vendor support assessment.

Implementation:

  • Laboratory personnel must develop and follow defined software evaluation procedures.
  • Systematic review of software documentation is a key step.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Hands-on testing and comparison against regulatory standards are vital.

    • Implications:

    • A well-defined evaluation process ensures the selection of effective laboratory software.
    • Proper software selection prevents the introduction of new problems.
    • Enhances the efficiency and reliability of laboratory operations through informed technology choices.