Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal assessment of prosthetic valve dysfunction

Transesophageal echocardiography has added another dimension to the assessment of prosthetic valve dysfunction with high-resolution images that allow for more detailed structural evaluation of tissue and mechanical valves. This study is a retrospective analysis of 140 prosthetic valves (90 tissue, 50 mechanical) in the mitral (89), aortic (45), and tricuspid (6) position in 116 patients studied by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography techniques. Transesophageal echocardiography was consistently better than the transthoracic technique in the evaluation of structural abnormalities of tissue valves in the mitral and aortic positions with respect to leaflet thickening, prolapse, flail, and vegetations. With transesophageal echocardiography, five tissue mitral valves had flail leaflets that were not identified by the transthoracic technique. Transesophageal echocardiography was better than transthoracic in the detection, quantification, and localization of prosthetic mitral regurgitation. Physiological mitral regurgitation was detected in 31 valves by transesophageal echocardiography compared to seven by transthoracic technique. By transesophageal echocardiography, mitral regurgitation was paravalvular in 24% compared with 4% by transthoracic technique. Left atrial spontaneous contrast was seen in 42% of the patients with a mitral prosthesis detected only by transesophageal echocardiography. Six patients had left atrial or left atrial appendage thrombus and in five patients they were detected only by transesophageal echocardiography. We conclude that transesophageal echocardiography should be a complimentary test to transthoracic studies in patients with suspected prosthetic valve dysfunction or for the follow-up of older tissue valves.