Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A hybrid decision framework for evaluating psychometric evidence.

D B Marlowe1

  • 1Addiction Research & Treatment, MCP/Hahnemann University, Camden, NJ 08104, USA.

Behavioral Sciences & the Law
|April 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multidimensional assessment of perceived treatment-entry pressures among substance abusers.

Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors·2001
Same author

Community reinforcement training for family and significant others of drug abusers: a unilateral intervention to increase treatment entry of drug users.

Drug and alcohol dependence·1999
Same author

Voluntary intoxication and criminal responsibility.

Behavioral sciences & the law·1999
Same author

Congruence of the MCMI-II and MCMI-III in cocaine dependence.

Journal of personality assessment·1998
Same author

Schedule of voucher delivery influences initiation of cocaine abstinence.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·1998
Same author

Counselor prompts to increase condom taking during treatment for cocaine dependence.

Behavior modification·1998

This study offers a decision flowchart to help courts evaluate psychometric evidence. It operationalizes legal standards for scientific reasoning in admissibility decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Forensic Science
  • Legal Standards in Evidence

Background:

  • The Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals ruling (1993) mandates federal judges to assess the scientific validity of expert testimony.
  • Evaluating psychometric evidence in legal contexts presents challenges due to the interdisciplinary nature of science and law.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a practical framework for evaluating the admissibility and probative value of psychometric data in legal proceedings.
  • To bridge the gap between scientific methodologies and legal evidentiary standards.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a decision flowchart for assessing psychometric data.
  • Operationalization of legal evidentiary standards within a scientific evaluation context.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework provides a structured approach for judges and forensic experts.
  • It facilitates a clearer understanding and application of scientific reasoning in court.

Conclusions:

  • The decision flowchart enhances the evaluation of psychometric evidence, ensuring scientific rigor in legal admissibility.
  • This hybrid approach supports more informed decisions regarding the use of expert testimony in court.