Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding adverse events: human factors.

J Reason1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Manchester, UK.

Quality in Health Care : QHC
|May 8, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction?

Ergonomics·2010
Same author

[All memory is in the present. Hans-Gerhard Shäfer (18.12.1951-05.07.1995)].

Der Anaesthesist·2005
Same author

Safety in the operating theatre - Part 2: human error and organisational failure.

Quality & safety in health care·2005
Same author

Beyond the organisational accident: the need for "error wisdom" on the frontline.

Quality & safety in health care·2004
Same author

Combating omission errors through task analysis and good reminders.

Quality & safety in health care·2002
Same author

Human error: models and management.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2000
Same journal

Effectiveness of laxatives in adults.

Quality in health care : QHC·2001
Same journal

Understanding the organisational context for adverse events in the health services: the role of cultural censorship.

Quality in health care : QHC·2001
Same journal

A very public failure: lessons for quality improvement in healthcare organisations from the Bristol Royal Infirmary.

Quality in health care : QHC·2001
Same journal

A clinical informaticist to support primary care decision making.

Quality in health care : QHC·2001
Same journal

Formal consensus: the development of a national clinical guideline.

Quality in health care : QHC·2001
Same journal

Influence of evidence-based guidance on health policy and clinical practice in England.

Quality in health care : QHC·2001
See all related articles

Human factors, not technical issues, pose the greatest risk to complex systems like healthcare. Effective risk management requires addressing errors at all organizational levels, not just individual performance.

Area of Science:

  • Human factors research
  • Systems safety engineering
  • Organizational psychology

Background:

  • Human error is the primary threat in complex systems, including healthcare.
  • Human fallibility is inherent and cannot be entirely eliminated, necessitating robust risk management strategies.
  • Understanding different error types (slips, lapses, mistakes, violations) and their underlying mechanisms is crucial for effective intervention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the multifaceted nature of human error in complex systems.
  • To differentiate between active and latent failures and their organizational impact.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of various risk management approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Categorization of human errors into distinct types (execution, planning, information-handling, motivational).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Distinction between active failures (direct patient contact) and latent failures (organizational/managerial).
  • Analysis of error causation chains, from organizational factors to individual psychological states.

    • Main Results:

    • Safety-critical errors occur at all system levels, influenced by organizational decisions.
    • Individual psychological factors are the least manageable links in error causation chains.
    • Workplace conditions and task design significantly influence unsafe acts, often stemming from upstream organizational factors.

    Conclusions:

    • Sanctions and exhortations are largely ineffective for highly trained professionals.
    • Automation does not eliminate human factors issues but relocates them; team training offers significant performance enhancements.
    • Effective risk management necessitates a confidential incident monitoring system and multi-level interventions targeting individuals, tasks, situations, and the organization.