Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical use of etomidate.

B Thomas, L Meirlaen, G Rolly

    Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica
    |January 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary

    Etomidate and methohexital impact anesthesia induction differently. Methohexital lowered blood pressure initially, while Etomidate caused greater blood pressure and cardiac index fluctuations during intubation in open-heart surgery patients.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Reducing Variation in Palliative Treatment for Oesophago-Gastric Cancer: Insights from the National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit.

    Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2026
    Same author

    Assessing the vulnerability of commercial bivalves to intensifying atmospheric heatwaves in coastal ecosystems.

    Marine environmental research·2025
    Same author

    The effect of morphine in the development of neonatal cholestasis in extremely preterm neonates.

    Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine·2025
    Same author

    Nuclear Astrophysics in the Storage Ring: Background Suppressed Simultaneous Measurement of (p,γ) and (p,n) Reactions.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    First Measurement of the Neutron-Emission Probability with a Surrogate Reaction in Inverse Kinematics at a Heavy-Ion Storage Ring.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    A new approach for assessing the radioecological risk associated with the legacy discharge of oil derived natural radioactivity in the UK North Sea.

    Marine pollution bulletin·2025

    Area of Science:

    • Anesthesiology
    • Cardiovascular Physiology

    Background:

    • Anesthesia induction agents are critical for surgical procedures.
    • Understanding hemodynamic responses to induction agents is vital for patient safety, especially in high-risk surgeries like open-heart procedures.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the hemodynamic effects of etomidate and methohexital during anesthesia induction for open-heart surgery.
    • To assess the impact of these agents on blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac index, and stroke volume index.

    Main Methods:

    • A study involving 45 patients undergoing open-heart surgery.
    • Administration of either etomidate or methohexital for anesthesia induction.
    • Monitoring of blood pressure and heart rate for ten minutes post-injection.
    • Cardiac index and stroke volume index measured by impedance cardiography in a subgroup of 16 patients.

    Main Results:

    • Methohexital caused a 6% decrease in blood pressure one minute post-induction; etomidate did not change it.
    • Etomidate led to greater systolic blood pressure increases during intubation (+36%) compared to methohexital (+21%).
    • Both agents increased heart rate during intubation, with etomidate showing more pronounced, though transient, fluctuations in cardiac index and a sustained decrease in stroke volume index.

    Conclusions:

    • Hemodynamic responses to etomidate and methohexital during anesthesia induction vary significantly.
    • Etomidate's rapid action and lack of analgesia may contribute to its more pronounced hemodynamic effects.
    • Methohexital's initial blood pressure drop is likely due to vasodilation and myocardial depression.

    Related Experiment Videos