Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Use of meta-analysis for testing theory.

N Miller1, V E Pollock

  • 1University of Southern California, USA.

Evaluation & the Health Professions
|November 4, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Meta-analysis is powerful but fragile; unexamined moderators weaken results. Moderator analyses enhance theoretical understanding in psychological and health research by clarifying relationships and construct validity.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Surface-Topography Challenge: A Multi-Laboratory Benchmark Study to Advance the Characterization of Topography.

Tribology letters·2025
Same author

An app with brief behavioural support to promote physical activity after a cancer diagnosis (APPROACH): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Pilot and feasibility studies·2022
Same author

Informing patient choice and service planning in surgical voice restoration: valve usage over three years in a UK head and neck cancer unit.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2021
Same author

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in patients diagnosed with breast cancer: meta-analysis.

The British journal of surgery·2021
Same author

MicroRNAs as biomarkers of multimodal treatment for rectal cancer.

The British journal of surgery·2021
Same author

Co-Infection with SARS-COV-2 and Parainfluenza in a young adult patient with pneumonia: Case Report.

IDCases·2020

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Health Sciences
  • Medical Research

Background:

  • Meta-analytic reviews generally surpass qualitative reviews in research synthesis.
  • However, meta-analytic findings can be fragile, particularly if moderator variables are not analyzed.
  • Unexamined moderators can limit the robustness and interpretability of meta-analytic outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the fragility of meta-analytic outcomes when moderator variables are unexamined.
  • To discuss the contribution of moderator analyses to theoretical understanding in psychological, health, and medical research.
  • To explore meta-analysis's role in understanding underlying processes and assessing construct validity.

Main Methods:

  • The study emphasizes the importance of moderator analyses within the framework of meta-analytic reviews.
  • It considers both methodological and substantive variables as potential moderators.
  • The discussion focuses on the application and implications in psychological, health, and medical research.

Main Results:

  • Moderator analyses significantly contribute to increased theoretical understanding by explaining variance in effect sizes.
  • Examining moderators helps clarify established relationships and the processes underlying them.
  • This approach aids in assessing the convergent and discriminative construct validity of psychological and health concepts.

Conclusions:

  • While meta-analysis is a superior review method, its outcomes require careful interpretation, especially regarding moderators.
  • Moderator analyses are crucial for enhancing the theoretical depth and practical utility of meta-analytic findings.
  • Integrating moderator analysis strengthens the validity and understanding of research findings in health and psychological sciences.

Related Experiment Videos