Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interpreting and evaluating meta-analysis.

J A Hall1, R Rosenthal

  • 1Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Evaluation & the Health Professions
|November 4, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lessons learnt from the construction and implementation of a prospective ventral hernia database.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2024
Same author

Equipping for risk: Lessons learnt from the UK shale-gas experience on assessing environmental risks for the future geoenergy use of the deep subsurface.

The Science of the total environment·2024
Same author

Risk of hospitalisation or death in households with a case of COVID-19 in England: an analysis using the HOSTED data set.

Public health·2022
Same author

Women's experiences of early pregnancy assessment unit services: a qualitative investigation.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2021
Same author

Inter-Rater Agreement of the Classification of Intraoperative Adverse Events (ClassIntra) in Abdominal Surgery.

Annals of surgery·2021
Same author

HOSTED-England's Household Transmission Evaluation Dataset: preliminary findings from a novel passive surveillance system of COVID-19.

International journal of epidemiology·2021
Same journal

The "Twilight Zone" Is a Danger Zone: Why the Occupational-Clinical Divide in Burnout Assessment Is a False Dichotomy.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Equity in AI-Supported Functional Assessment: Agreement Between Clinician Judgment and Digital Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8b Short Form Among Nurses.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Commentary: Systemic Inequities in Japan's Technical Intern Training Program (TITP): Health, Labor, and Legal Vulnerabilities of Foreign Trainees.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Trials for Musculoskeletal Disorders in China: A Registry-Based Analysis.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Divergent Socioeconomic Pathways to Biologically Uncontrolled Diabetes by Gender: A Bayesian Analysis of NHANES 2021-2023.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
See all related articles

This guide helps interpret meta-analytic reviews by focusing on effect estimation and moderating factors. Readers should critically evaluate complex analyses and consider factors like heterogeneity and choice of analysis units.

Area of Science:

  • Research Methodology
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Meta-analysis is a statistical technique used to synthesize findings from multiple studies.
  • Understanding the nuances of meta-analytic reviews is crucial for accurate research interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide guidelines for interpreting and evaluating meta-analytic research reviews.
  • To highlight key considerations often overlooked in meta-analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of fundamental meta-analysis goals: combining results and comparing effects.
  • Examination of critical elements: unit of analysis, fixed vs. random effects, heterogeneity, appropriate contrasts, and measures of central tendency.

Main Results:

  • Offers practical suggestions for readers to assess meta-analytic studies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasizes the importance of understanding specific methodological choices within meta-analyses.

    • Conclusions:

    • Recommends a skeptical approach to meta-analytic results, especially those relying on complex analyses.
    • Encourages critical evaluation of the underlying methods and assumptions in meta-analytic reviews.