Related Experiment Videos
Treatment of autoimmune disease by immunomodulation through extracorporeal elimination and intravenous immunoglobulin
If customary drug mediated immunosuppressive therapy leads to intolerable side effects or is inefficient, extracorporeal elimination and untargeted or targeted immunoglobin therapy modulating the immune response are taken into consideration for the treatment of patients with autoimmune diseases. Both elimination and immunoglobulin therapy, are not alternatives but appear to act complementary, if sequentially applied. Selective immunoadsorption is increasingly applied for extracorporeal elimination and is able to replace plasma exchange therapy. Both, hydrophobic interaction chromatography and affinity chromatography are effective in given clinical conditions. Therapeutic affinity chromatography appears to be superior to hydrophobic interaction chromatography, if an effective, rapid elimination of the disease promoting agent is desired. Experience with therapeutic chromatography collected in the past, indicates that a rapid elimination of immunoglobulins and the subsequent intravenous infusion of 7S immunoglobulin is superior to elimination or untargeted immunomodulation alone. These experimental approaches lead to an extension of the available treatment modalities. However, controlled trials rather than anecdotal reports are needed, to provide substantial information.
If customary drug mediated immunosuppressive therapy leads to intolerable side effects or is inefficient, extracorporeal elimination and untargeted or targeted immunoglobin therapy modulating the immune response are taken into consideration for the treatment of patients with autoimmune diseases. Both elimination and immunoglobulin therapy, are not alternatives but appear to act complementary, if sequentially applied. Selective immunoadsorption is increasingly applied for extracorporeal elimination and is able to replace plasma exchange therapy. Both, hydrophobic interaction chromatography and affinity chromatography are effective in given clinical conditions. Therapeutic affinity chromatography appears to be superior to hydrophobic interaction chromatography, if an effective, rapid elimination of the disease promoting agent is desired. Experience with therapeutic chromatography collected in the past, indicates that a rapid elimination of immunoglobulins and the subsequent intravenous infusion of 7S immunoglobulin is superior to elimination or untargeted immunomodulation alone. These experimental approaches lead to an extension of the available treatment modalities. However, controlled trials rather than anecdotal reports are needed, to provide substantial information.