Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using MVA and EVA to measure financial performance.

L C Gapenski1

  • 1University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.

Healthcare Financial Management : Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association
|February 7, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Debt-maturity structures should match risk preferences.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·2000
Same author

Differences in characteristics of hospitals with sustained high and sustained low profitability.

Hospital & health services administration·1996
Same author

Impact of capitation contracts on financial risk: a Monte Carlo simulation.

Health services management research·1996
Same author

Predicting financial risk under capitation.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·1995
Same author

Health care financial management curriculum content: views of practitioners and academics.

The Journal of health administration education·1994
Same author

Hospital capital structure decisions: theory and practice.

Health services management research·1993
Same journal

Highlights from the HFM blog.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·2018
Same journal

Hospitals face challenges from Medicare cost and payment trends.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·2018
Same journal

The fate of value-based care with an ACA repeal.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·2018
Same journal

Beyond the Medicare annual well visit: maximizing revenue for hospital-owned practices.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·2018
Same journal

Incorporating social determinants into population health management.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·2018
Same journal

Health Care 2020 Part 3: Consolidation.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·2018
See all related articles

Market Value Added (MVA) and Economic Value Added (EVA) are increasingly used financial performance measures in healthcare. MVA suits investor-owned groups, while EVA is best for not-for-profits, offering a fuller financial picture.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Financial Management
  • Accounting and Finance
  • Organizational Performance Measurement

Background:

  • Traditional profitability measures in healthcare often overlook the cost of equity capital.
  • Market Value Added (MVA) and Economic Value Added (EVA) are emerging as advanced financial performance metrics.
  • These metrics are gaining traction in both investor-owned and not-for-profit healthcare sectors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and differentiate Market Value Added (MVA) and Economic Value Added (EVA) as financial performance tools.
  • To highlight the specific applicability of MVA for investor-owned healthcare organizations.
  • To emphasize the suitability of EVA for not-for-profit healthcare organizations.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of financial performance measures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the theoretical underpinnings of MVA and EVA.
  • Application context for different healthcare organizational structures.

    • Main Results:

    • MVA and EVA incorporate the cost of equity capital, offering a more comprehensive view than traditional metrics.
    • MVA is identified as the most appropriate measure for investor-owned healthcare entities.
    • EVA is determined to be the optimal measure for not-for-profit healthcare entities.

    Conclusions:

    • MVA and EVA represent significant advancements in healthcare financial performance assessment.
    • Wider adoption of MVA and EVA is anticipated as financial managers gain familiarity.
    • These measures can enhance the evaluation of financial health in diverse healthcare organizations.