Related Experiment Videos
Screening for mild hypertension: costs and benefits
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
|September 1, 1978
Summary
General practice case-finding for mild hypertension is more cost-effective than community screening. This approach offers a lower cost per life year extended by the National Health Service program.
Area of Science:
- Health economics
- Public health
- Cardiovascular disease management
Background:
- Implementing new National Health Service (NHS) screening and treatment programs requires thorough cost-benefit analysis.
- Mild hypertension management is a key area for public health intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of community-based screening versus general practice case-finding for mild hypertension.
- To estimate the cost per life year extended by a general practice-based hypertension program.
Main Methods:
- Cost analysis of community-based screening for mild hypertension.
- Cost analysis of case-finding for mild hypertension within general practice settings.
- Calculation of the cost per life year extended based on a five-year program projection.
Main Results:
- Case-finding in general practice is identified as a less expensive and more efficient strategy compared to community-based screening.
- The study provides a minimum cost estimate for extending a life through a general practice-based hypertension program.
Conclusions:
- General practice case-finding presents a more economically viable approach for mild hypertension management within the NHS.
- The findings support the implementation of case-finding strategies in primary care for improved health outcomes and resource allocation.