Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical database repository--a solution for outcomes assessment.

D Larson1, L A Straub

  • 1TELCOR Inc., USA.

Clinical Laboratory Management Review : Official Publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association
|February 7, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Kinetic study of strong shock waves in fully ionized plasmas.

Physical review. E·2026
Same author

The impact of low-mode symmetry on inertial fusion energy output in the burning plasma state.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Design of the first fusion experiment to achieve target energy gain G>1.

Physical review. E·2024
Same author

Achievement of Target Gain Larger than Unity in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

A proposed methodology for uncertainty extraction and verification in priority setting partnerships with the James Lind Alliance: an example from the Common Conditions Affecting the Hand and Wrist Priority Setting Partnership.

BMC medical research methodology·2022
Same author

Lawson Criterion for Ignition Exceeded in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2022
Same journal

What is your return on your skills investment?

Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association·2000
Same journal

As we see it. Outreach.

Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association·2000
Same journal

Dollar$ & $en$e. Part III: Measuring added value.

Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association·2000
Same journal

When a health-care plan does not cover an ordered test.

Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association·2000
Same journal

Career development strategies. The psycho-barbarian manager.

Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association·2000
Same journal

The use of the Delphi panel for consensus development on indicators of laboratory performance.

Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association·2000
See all related articles

A Clinical Database Repository (CDR) enhances healthcare by integrating lab data for better quality and cost management. This technology helps organizations improve patient care through data validation and practice guideline adherence.

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Data Management

Background:

  • Healthcare organizations face increasing pressure to improve quality and manage costs.
  • Routinely collected laboratory data holds potential for broader organizational outcomes assessment.
  • Existing systems may not fully leverage integrated data for comprehensive analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the implementation of a Clinical Database Repository (CDR).
  • To highlight the CDR as a tool for active response to quality and cost demands.
  • To explore the potential of CDR for expanding outcomes assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of the technical components of a CDR.
  • Explanation of CDR implementation methodologies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of deployment benefits for healthcare organizations.

    • Main Results:

    • CDR enables integration of unlimited laboratory data with other systems.
    • Facilitates outcomes assessment by expanding the use of routinely collected data.
    • Supports positive and cost-effective influence on patient care delivery.

    Conclusions:

    • CDR offers a technological solution for enhancing healthcare quality and cost-efficiency.
    • System rules validation, measuring new technology benefits, and reducing practice variation are key outcomes.
    • The full potential of CDR for outcomes assessment remains an area for further exploration.