Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing providers' performance: problems in making the "report card" analogy fit.

D S Wakefield1, M S Hendryx, T Uden-Holman

  • 1University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.

Journal for Healthcare Quality : Official Publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
|October 4, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Report cards comparing healthcare providers may be misleading. Differences in how hospitals collect data, such as for nosocomial infections, can skew performance comparisons and quality assessments.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Skeletal findings in the first 12 months following initiation of glucocorticoid therapy for pediatric nephrotic syndrome.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2013
Same author

The development of bone mineral lateralization in the arms.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2012
Same author

Science and regulation. Mountaintop mining consequences.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2010
Same author

Are verbal orders a threat to patient safety?

Postgraduate medical journal·2009
Same author

Are verbal orders a threat to patient safety?

Quality & safety in health care·2009
Same author

An exploratory study measuring verbal order content and context.

Quality & safety in health care·2009

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare quality assessment
  • Health services research
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Performance "report cards" are used to compare healthcare providers.
  • Variations in data collection methods may impact the validity of these comparisons.
  • Nosocomial infections are a key metric for evaluating healthcare quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the impact of data collection differences on provider performance comparisons.
  • To examine how surveillance practices influence reported nosocomial infection rates.
  • To determine if "report card" strategies accurately reflect provider quality.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of reported nosocomial infection rates from 31 midwest hospitals.
  • Comparison of infection rates across different nursing units and hospital types.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of surveillance practices and their correlation with reported infection data.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant variations in reported nosocomial infection rates were observed.
    • Substantial differences in nosocomial infection surveillance practices were identified.
    • Surveillance practice variations partially explained the differences in reported infection rates.

    Conclusions:

    • Differences in data collection processes can lead to inaccurate conclusions about provider quality.
    • Healthcare "report cards" may not reliably differentiate providers due to methodological variations.
    • Standardization of data collection is crucial for meaningful performance comparisons.