Related Experiment Videos
Non-destructive evaluation of membrane lung gas exchange performance
R D Tallman1, Z A Guardia, M A Gruber
1Division of Circulation Technology, School of Allied Medical Professions, Ohio State University, USA.
The Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology
|November 3, 1996
Summary
This study presents a novel method for evaluating hollow fiber oxygenator gas exchange effectiveness. The Sorin Masterflo 34 demonstrated superior gas transport and effectiveness compared to other tested devices.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Cardiopulmonary Support
- Medical Device Evaluation
Background:
- Hollow fiber oxygenators are critical in cardiopulmonary bypass.
- Accurate evaluation of gas exchange is essential for patient safety and device optimization.
- Existing methods for evaluating oxygenator performance can be complex, costly, or compromise device sterility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a new, non-invasive method for assessing the gas exchange effectiveness of hollow fiber oxygenators.
- To compare the performance of three commercially available pediatric oxygenators using the developed evaluation technique.
Main Methods:
- A novel gas exchange evaluation technique was applied to three pediatric oxygenators (Medtronic Minimax Plus, Terumo Capiox 320, Sorin Masterflo 34).
- Gas mixtures simulating venous blood conditions were introduced on the 'blood' side, while a controlled oxygen-air mixture flowed through the gas port.
- Gas partial pressures at inlets and outlets were analyzed to calculate efficacy indices and gas transfer rates.
Main Results:
- The Sorin Masterflo 34 exhibited the highest gas transport rates and overall effectiveness.
- The Medtronic Minimax Plus showed significantly altered gas exchange effectiveness when flow direction was reversed.
- Performance rankings were: Masterflo 34 > Minimax Plus > Capiox 320.
Conclusions:
- The developed evaluation technique provides an accurate, reliable, and non-contaminating method for assessing oxygenator gas exchange.
- This method allows for consistent, cost-effective, and rapid evaluation of membrane lung performance.
- The findings offer valuable insights for device manufacturers in quality control and new oxygenator development.