Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The lab manager's role in assessing new technology.

C A Lehmann1, A M Leiken, R Geidner

  • 1School of Health Technology and Management, State University of New York, Stony Brook, USA.

MLO: Medical Laboratory Observer
|December 8, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diagnostic technology for laboratories in an integrated delivery system.

Clinical leadership & management review : the journal of CLMA·2002
Same author

Reengineering the clinical laboratory. Transitioning to an open laboratory.

MLO: medical laboratory observer·1996
Same author

Ketorolac vs meperidine for the management of pain in the emergency department.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·1994
Same author

Do automated instruments reduce job satisfaction?

MLO: medical laboratory observer·1990
Same author

Evaluating managerial efficiency of Veterans Administration medical centers using Data Envelopment Analysis.

Medical care·1989
Same author

The impact of prospective reimbursement on nursing home efficiency.

Medical care·1989

Implementing new laboratory technology without experienced guidance can lead to costly long-term issues. This analysis highlights common pitfalls and provides strategies to avoid them for sustainable lab operations.

Area of Science:

  • Laboratory Management
  • Technology Implementation
  • Operational Efficiency

Background:

  • New technology adoption in laboratories often overlooks critical operational factors.
  • Lack of experienced input can lead to unforeseen challenges and inefficiencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify common mistakes in laboratory technology implementation.
  • To provide actionable strategies for avoiding these errors.
  • To emphasize the importance of experienced oversight in technology adoption.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common laboratory technology implementation failures.
  • Analysis of case studies where short-term savings led to long-term problems.
  • Expert consultation synthesis on best practices for technology integration.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Short-term cost savings from new technology can mask significant long-term operational disasters.
  • Failure to involve lab managers and stakeholders leads to suboptimal technology integration.
  • Inadequate risk assessment and planning are primary drivers of implementation failure.

Conclusions:

  • Prioritizing experienced input and comprehensive planning is crucial for successful technology adoption in labs.
  • Avoiding common implementation mistakes ensures long-term operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
  • Strategic technology integration, guided by expertise, prevents future laboratory disasters.