Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating quality in managed care networks.

D O'Leary1

  • 1Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Oakwood Terrace, IL 60181, USA.

Health Care Management (Philadelphia, Pa.)
|September 5, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Professional challenges faced by student radiographers during COVID-19.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2025
Same author

A method for estimating and characterizing explicitly nonlinear dynamic functional network connectivity in resting-state fMRI data.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2023
Same author

The impact of alternating drainage and inundation cycles on geochemistry and microbiology of intact peat cores.

The Science of the total environment·2022
Same author

Screening for second malignancies in mycosis fungoides: non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, lung cancer, bladder cancer and melanoma.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2021
Same author

The impact of COVID-19 upon student radiographers and clinical training.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2020
Same author

Mycosis fungoides: developments in incidence, treatment and survival.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2020
Same journal

Future trends in chronic disability and institutionalization: implications for long-term care needs.

Health care management (Philadelphia, Pa.)·1997
Same journal

Transforming the long-term care system: policy and managerial challenges.

Health care management (Philadelphia, Pa.)·1997
Same journal

Specialization and diversification in the nursing home industry.

Health care management (Philadelphia, Pa.)·1997
Same journal

Legal and policy issues in long-term care.

Health care management (Philadelphia, Pa.)·1997
Same journal

Patient management and use of medication in long-term care.

Health care management (Philadelphia, Pa.)·1997
Same journal

Role of nursing in long-term care.

Health care management (Philadelphia, Pa.)·1997
See all related articles

Effective managed care requires robust network evaluation methods. Key areas include ethics, care continuity, leadership, and performance improvement, with public disclosure vital for success.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Network Evaluation
  • Managed Care Systems

Background:

  • Managed care organizations (MCOs) are increasingly prevalent in healthcare delivery.
  • The success of managed care hinges on the effective functioning of its constituent networks.
  • Standardized methods for evaluating these individual networks are currently lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline essential components for evaluating individual managed care networks.
  • To emphasize the importance of a comprehensive approach to network assessment.
  • To advocate for public disclosure of evaluation findings to ensure accountability.

Main Methods:

  • The study identifies and describes critical domains for network evaluation.
  • These domains encompass ethical considerations, care delivery processes, and operational management.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The methodology involves a qualitative review of essential evaluation criteria.

    • Main Results:

    • Crucial evaluation areas identified: rights, responsibilities, ethics; continuum of care; education and communication; network leadership; human resources management; information management; and performance improvement.
    • A structured evaluation framework is proposed.
    • Public disclosure is highlighted as a necessary step for validating evaluation outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • A systematic evaluation of managed care networks is essential for their success.
    • Comprehensive assessment across multiple domains ensures network quality and effectiveness.
    • Transparency through public disclosure is critical for building trust and ensuring accountability in managed care.