Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Fortune 1,000 ranked within industries

    Fortune
    |April 28, 1997
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study analyzes the performance of top US companies across various metrics. It reveals significant variations in profitability and investor returns among industries and individual firms.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same journal

    THE RIDDLE OF THE WALL IN THE BRAIN.

    Fortune·2016
    Same journal

    BLOOD TESTING IS BOOMING.

    Fortune·2016
    Same journal

    INTO THE LIGHT.

    Fortune·2016
    Same journal

    BIG INNOVATION IN SMALL PLACES.

    Fortune·2016
    Same journal

    HACKER BAD BOY VENTURE CAPITALIST DISRUPTER HEALER.

    Fortune·2016
    Same journal

    THE FIGHT TO DOMINATE BIG PHARMA(CY).

    Fortune·2016

    Area of Science:

    • Business and Economics
    • Financial Analysis
    • Industrial Performance Metrics

    Background:

    • The performance of American industries is complex, with significant variations existing both between and within sectors.
    • Understanding these differences is crucial for investors and industry analysts.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To provide a comprehensive overview of the performance of the top 1,000 American companies.
    • To analyze performance across 12 key metrics, including profits, employee numbers, and return on equity.
    • To highlight inter-industry and intra-industry performance disparities.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of financial data for the top 1,000 US companies.
    • Evaluation based on 12 distinct performance indicators.
    • Comparative analysis across different industry groups and individual companies.

    Main Results:

    • Significant performance variations observed across industries; for instance, health care showed 24% profit growth but a -23% investor return.
    • Computer peripherals companies reported 0% profit growth yet achieved a 101% total return to investors.
    • Intra-industry performance divergence was notable, with Compaq's profits increasing by 66% while Apple's decreased by 292%.

    Conclusions:

    • Industry sector and individual company performance can differ dramatically, even when using the same financial metrics.
    • Investor returns do not always correlate directly with profit growth, highlighting the complexity of financial performance.
    • A wide performance spectrum exists within the American industrial landscape, necessitating nuanced analysis.

    Related Experiment Videos