Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis.

A M Garber1, C E Phelps

  • 1Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, CA, USA. garber@stanford.edu

Journal of Health Economics
|January 7, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) principles were investigated to guide medical intervention resource allocation. A uniform CEA criterion is unlikely to achieve optimal resource allocation in diverse populations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychopharmacological characterisation of the successive negative contrast effect in rats.

Psychopharmacology·2015
Same author

Multimedia quality of life assessment: advances with FLAIR.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2006
Same author

Quality of life assessment software for computer-inexperienced older adults: multimedia utility elicitation for activities of daily living.

Proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2002
Same author

Footsteps on a rocky path.

Journal of Christian nursing : a quarterly publication of Nurses Christian Fellowship·2002
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of automated external defibrillators on airlines.

JAMA·2001
Same author

Evidence-based coverage policy.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2001

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Decision Science
  • Medical Intervention Evaluation

Background:

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is widely used for healthcare resource allocation but faces application controversies.
  • Existing frameworks may not adequately account for population heterogeneity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the fundamental principles of cost-effectiveness analysis.
  • To explore the implications of these principles for evaluating medical interventions.
  • To derive a cost-effectiveness criterion within a utility framework.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a standard von Neumann-Morgenstern utility framework.
  • Derived a cost-effectiveness criterion based on utility theory.
  • Analyzed how the criterion varies with demographic and economic factors.

Main Results:

  • A cost-effectiveness criterion can be derived to guide resource allocation.
  • This criterion is sensitive to individual characteristics such as age, gender, income, and risk aversion.
  • A single, uniform criterion is insufficient for Pareto-optimal resource allocation in heterogeneous populations.

Conclusions:

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis is a valuable tool for resource allocation decisions.
  • Tailoring cost-effectiveness criteria to population subgroups is crucial for optimizing resource allocation.
  • Uniform application of cost-effectiveness criteria may lead to suboptimal outcomes in diverse populations.

Related Experiment Videos