Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Primary care. Who's sorry now?

D Martin1, A Hague, R Isaacs

  • 1School of Health and Related Research, Sheffield University, UK.

The Health Service Journal
|June 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What the COVID pandemic taught us about the management of pediatric minor trauma.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2023
Same author

Implementing post-normal science with or for EU policy actors: using quantitative story-telling.

Sustainability science·2023
Same author

BAG-1 suppresses expression of the key regulatory cytokine transforming growth factor β (TGF-β1) in colorectal tumour cells.

Oncogene·2012
Same author

The retinoblastoma protein (Rb) as an anti-apoptotic factor: expression of Rb is required for the anti-apoptotic function of BAG-1 protein in colorectal tumour cells.

Cell death & disease·2012
Same author

BAG-1 interacts with the p50-p50 homodimeric NF-κB complex: implications for colorectal carcinogenesis.

Oncogene·2011
Same author

International EMBO Molecular Medicine Workshop 2011 on 'Cell Death and Disease'.

Cell death and differentiation·2011
Same journal

Clouds, Silver Linings and Storm Desmond.

The Health service journal·2018
Same journal

Time to Nurture Better Services.

The Health service journal·2018
Same journal

Let Patient Experience Take Centre Stage.

The Health service journal·2018
Same journal

First Do No Harm.

The Health service journal·2018
Same journal

Sepsis Faces a New Front.

The Health service journal·2018
Same journal

Back to the Drawing Board.

The Health service journal·2018
See all related articles

Most health authorities report improved relationships with General Practitioners (GPs) post-merger. However, many Local Medical Committees (LMCs) perceive no change or a decline, particularly in understanding GP contracts and payments.

Area of Science:

  • Health services research
  • Healthcare management
  • Primary care policy

Background:

  • Mergers of health authorities can significantly impact relationships with primary care providers.
  • General Practitioners (GPs) are central to healthcare delivery, and their engagement with health authorities is crucial.
  • Understanding the effects of organizational changes on GP-LMC relationships is vital for effective healthcare policy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the perceived impact of health authority mergers on relationships with General Practitioners (GPs).
  • To evaluate changes in the understanding of GP contracts and payments from the perspective of Local Medical Committees (LMCs).

Main Methods:

  • Survey-based assessment of health authorities and LMCs.
  • Analysis of perceived changes in inter-organizational relationships post-merger.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of knowledge transfer regarding GP contracts and financial arrangements.

    • Main Results:

    • Nearly two-thirds of health authorities reported improved relationships with GPs following the merger.
    • 44% of LMCs reported no change, and 42% reported a deterioration in their relationship with health authorities.
    • Over 50% of LMCs indicated a decline in understanding GP contracts and payment structures post-merger.

    Conclusions:

    • While health authorities perceive improved GP relations, LMCs report mixed to negative outcomes, highlighting a disconnect.
    • The merger appears to have negatively impacted LMCs' comprehension of GP contractual and financial matters.
    • Further investigation is needed to address the divergent perceptions and ensure effective communication and support for GPs.