Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How not to develop telemedicine systems.

P Yellowlees1

  • 1University of Queensland Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Centre, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Australia. P.Yellowlees@mailbox.uq.edu.au

Telemedicine Today
|April 7, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Attitudes toward psychiatry among students entering medical school.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2003
Same author

An analysis of why telehealth systems in Australia have not always succeeded.

Journal of telemedicine and telecare·2001
Same author

Telehealth and the diagnosis and management of cardiac disease.

Journal of telemedicine and telecare·2001
Same author

Videoconferencing in the Queensland health service.

Journal of telemedicine and telecare·2001
Same author

Guidelines for using videoconferencing in mental health services.

Journal of telemedicine and telecare·2001
Same author

The perceived utility of six selected measures of consumer outcomes proposed for routine use in Australian mental health services.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2000
Same journal

Iris scanning: the eye of the storm. Several industries have hastened development of authentication technologies-including healthcare.

Telemedicine today·2003
Same journal

India telemedicine venture seeks to improve care, increase access. Spurred by government initiatives, private industry invests in linked hospital network.

Telemedicine today·2003
Same journal

Risk management for telemedicine providers: how to stay out of jail. Six standards define whether arrangements fall within safe harbors.

Telemedicine today·2003
Same journal

Interactive home telehealth: moving from cost savings to reimbursement. Creative, proactive strategies help agencies turn telehealth into a revenue generator.

Telemedicine today·2003
Same journal

Pioneering corrections service offers tips for success. UTMB's success tied to close alignment between information technology and clinical services groups.

Telemedicine today·2003
Same journal

Telepharmacy offers hope for rural hospitals. National pharmacist shortage prompts innovative approach to hospital-based services in Washington state.

Telemedicine today·2003
See all related articles

Many telemedicine systems fail due to common pitfalls. This study outlines six evidence-based rules that, if followed, guarantee project failure, hindering effective telemedicine implementation.

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Medical Technology
  • Digital Health

Background:

  • The historical trajectory of telemedicine implementation is marked by a high rate of system failures and limited operational longevity.
  • Understanding the underlying causes of these failures is crucial for improving future telemedicine initiatives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and present a set of six actionable rules that, if followed, lead to the failure of telemedicine projects.
  • To highlight common practices that undermine the success and effectiveness of telemedicine systems.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive review of existing literature on telemedicine system failures.
  • Analysis of personal experiences and case studies in telemedicine project management.
  • Synthesis of evidence into a distinct set of six guiding principles for project failure.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Six specific rules were identified that consistently contribute to the failure or suboptimal performance of telemedicine initiatives.
  • These rules, derived from empirical evidence and practical experience, represent common adherence points in unsuccessful projects.

Conclusions:

  • Adherence to these six rules significantly increases the likelihood of telemedicine project failure.
  • Avoiding these detrimental practices is essential for enhancing the functionality and long-term viability of telemedicine systems.