Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mechanical characterization of biodegradable implants.

L E Claes1

  • 1Abteilung für Unfallchirurgische Forschung und Biomechanik, Universität Ulm, Germany.

Clinical Materials
|December 10, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The direction of tissue strain affects the neovascularization in the fracture-healing zone.

Medical hypotheses·2020
Same author

Histomorphometric Analysis of Callus Formation Stimulated by Axial Dynamisation in a Standardised Ovine Osteotomy Model.

BioMed research international·2019
Same author

A case for optimising fracture healing through inverse dynamization.

Medical hypotheses·2013
Same author

Effect of the fixator stiffness on the young regenerate bone after bone transport: computational approach.

Journal of biomechanics·2010
Same author

[Development and perspectives for orthopedic and trauma research in Germany].

Der Unfallchirurg·2009
Same author

Simulation of the nutrient supply in fracture healing.

Journal of biomechanics·2009
Same journal

Product liability implications of biomaterials in the United States.

Clinical materials·1993
Same journal

Biocompatibility evaluation of laser-induced AAm and HEMA grafted EPR. Part 1: In-vitro study.

Clinical materials·1993
Same journal

Early effects of the self-reinforced PGA implant on a growing bone: an experimental study on growing rats.

Clinical materials·1993
Same journal

Bone formation and remodeling around implanted materials under load-bearing conditions.

Clinical materials·1993
Same journal

The effects of lactic acid on PGE2 production by macrophages and human synovial fibroblasts: a possible explanation for problems associated with the degradation of poly(lactide) implants?

Clinical materials·1993
Same journal

Glassy carbon implant as a bone graft substitute: an experimental study on rabbits.

Clinical materials·1993
See all related articles

Degradable implant materials have low mechanical strength compared to metals, limiting their use in orthopaedic surgery. Enhancements like fibre-reinforcement do not significantly increase stiffness, while creep and degradation rates vary widely.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopaedic Engineering
  • Polymer Science

Background:

  • Current metallic implants offer superior mechanical properties but lack biodegradability.
  • Degradable implant materials present challenges in achieving sufficient strength and predictable degradation for load-bearing applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the mechanical properties of various degradable implant materials.
  • To discuss limitations and potential improvements for degradable orthopaedic implants.
  • To highlight the characteristic creep and relaxation behaviors of these materials.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of mechanical properties (strength, modulus).
  • Evaluation of creep and relaxation behaviors.
  • Review of in vitro and in vivo degradation rates for different materials.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Degradable materials exhibit lower mechanical properties than orthopaedic metals.
  • Techniques like fibre-reinforcement or high molecular weight do not significantly increase material modulus.
  • Creep and relaxation are inherent properties limiting load-bearing applications.
  • In vitro and in vivo degradation rates vary substantially, from weeks to three years.

Conclusions:

  • The mechanical limitations and variable degradation profiles of current degradable materials restrict their use in load-carrying orthopaedic implants.
  • Further research is needed to enhance the mechanical integrity and control the degradation of these biomaterials.