Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone accretion around polymethylmethacrylate and polyethylene implanted in the rabbit tibia.

S B Goodman1, V L Fornasier, J Lee

  • 1Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, California.

Contemporary Orthopaedics
|February 7, 1993
PubMed
Summary

This study compared how different types of polymeric implants affect bone growth in rabbit tibias. Researchers placed implants in one tibia and left the other as a control. They found that doughy PMMA implants reduced bone formation, while preformed PMMA and polyethylene implants tended to support bone growth. The results suggest that implant form and material properties influence osseointegration. The study used tetracycline injections to track bone growth and fluorescent microscopy to measure accretion rates. These findings may inform implant design and surgical practices in orthopedic surgery.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional analysis of Box II mutations in yeast site-specific recombinases Flp and R. Significance of amino acid conservation within the Int family and the yeast sub-family.

Journal of molecular biology·1992
Same author

Fluorescence study of the ligand stereospecificity for binding to lumazine protein.

European journal of biochemistry·1992
Same author

Reduction of postoperative adhesions in strabismus surgery.

Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO·1992
Same author

The Red Cross and CDC's natural-disaster surveillance system.

American journal of public health·1992
Same author

Cumulative logit modelling for ordinal response variables: applications to biomedical research.

Computer applications in the biosciences : CABIOS·1992
Same author

The sagittal ramus osteotomy. Stability of fixation with internal miniplates.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·1992

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic biomaterials research
  • Surgical implant integration
  • Tissue engineering in bone regeneration

Background:

Current understanding of bone-implant interactions remains incomplete. While prior research has shown how various materials influence osseointegration, the specific effects of different implant forms remain unclear. Studies have demonstrated that implant surface properties and material composition can alter bone growth patterns. However, the role of implant morphology and polymerization state in bone accretion is not fully understood. This gap motivated researchers to investigate how different physical forms of polymeric implants affect bone formation around orthopedic devices. No prior work had resolved how doughy versus preformed implants influence osseointegration. The study aimed to clarify these effects using a controlled animal model. Understanding these mechanisms could improve implant design and surgical outcomes. The need for precise data on bone-implant interactions remains critical in orthopedic research.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to compare bone accretion rates around different forms of polymeric implants in a controlled rabbit model. Researchers focused on how implant morphology and polymerization state affect osseointegration. The specific problem addressed was the variability in bone formation around orthopedic implants made from polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and polyethylene. Motivation came from clinical observations of inconsistent implant integration and the need for better predictive models. The researchers sought to determine whether implant form—bulk, doughy, or particulate—impacts bone growth dynamics. They also aimed to distinguish between the effects of heat and residual monomer on osseointegration. The study sought to provide data to guide implant design and material selection. The goal was to clarify how implant characteristics influence bone healing in orthopedic surgery.

Keywords:
bone growth around implantsosseointegration in orthopedicspolymer implant effectsanimal model for implant integration

Frequently Asked Questions

Doughy PMMA implants suppressed bone formation compared to controls, while preformed PMMA and polyethylene implants tended to enhance bone accretion.

Tetracycline injections were used to mark bone growth intervals, and fluorescent microscopy measured the distance between successive bands.

The authors propose that polymerization heat or residual monomer in the doughy PMMA group may inhibit bone growth.

Bulk and particulate polyethylene both enhanced bone accretion, though the effect was less marked in particulate form.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The study used 40 mature female New Zealand white rabbits for implant testing. Bilateral 6mm drill holes were placed in the anteromedial tibias, 1cm from the joint line. Each rabbit received an implant in one tibia and a nonimplanted control in the other. Five implant types were tested: preformed PMMA, doughy PMMA, PMMA powder, bulk polyethylene, and polyethylene particles of two sizes. All implants were placed in the same anatomical location. Animals were monitored for four months before being euthanized with barbiturate overdose. Tetracycline injections were given to mark bone growth intervals. Tibiae were harvested undecalcified for fluorescent microscopic analysis. The distance between tetracycline bands was measured to assess bone accretion rates.

Main Results:

Doughy PMMA implants showed reduced bone formation compared to the control side. Preformed PMMA plugs and PMMA powder did not suppress bone growth as strongly. This difference may relate to polymerization heat or residual monomer in the doughy group. Polyethylene implants, in both bulk and particulate forms, tended to enhance bone accretion. The effect was less pronounced with particulate polyethylene compared to bulk implants. Tetracycline band spacing indicated faster bone growth around polyethylene. No significant differences were found between the two polyethylene particle sizes. The control side showed baseline bone formation rates. These findings suggest implant material and preparation method influence osseointegration. The results highlight the importance of implant morphology in orthopedic surgery.

Conclusions:

The authors observed that implant form significantly affects bone accretion rates in orthopedic surgery. Doughy PMMA implants suppressed bone formation compared to controls. Preformed PMMA and PMMA powder did not show the same inhibitory effect. This may be attributed to polymerization heat or residual monomer in the doughy group. Polyethylene implants, whether bulk or particulate, tended to facilitate bone growth. The effect was less marked with particulate polyethylene. These findings suggest implant morphology influences osseointegration outcomes. The study does not claim causality but proposes correlations between implant characteristics and bone formation. The authors do not generalize these results to all implant types or clinical settings. The findings support further investigation into implant design and material properties.

Bilateral 6mm drill holes were made in the anteromedial tibias, with implants placed in one tibia and a nonimplanted control in the other.

The authors suggest that implant morphology and material properties may influence osseointegration outcomes.