Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Photoepicutaneous testing with the chamber method.

R Suhonen, M Hannuksela, V Pirilä

    Contact Dermatitis
    |April 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Effectiveness of nurse-led interventions on self-care behaviors of patients living with cancer: A systematic review.

    European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society·2026
    Same author

    The experiences of doctorally prepared nurses and doctoral nursing students with being mentored in the Nurse-Lead programme: A focus group study.

    Nurse education in practice·2023
    Same author

    Hospitalised cancer patients' perceptions of individualised nursing care in four European countries.

    European journal of cancer care·2016
    Same author

    Collaboration between hospital and primary care nurses: a literature review.

    International nursing review·2015
    Same author

    Nurses' knowledge about venous leg ulcer care: a literature review.

    International nursing review·2014
    Same author

    Thiokol as a frequent cause of dermatitis.

    Acta allergologica·2014
    Same journal

    Contact Allergy and Allergic Contact Dermatitis From Propylene Glycol and Related Glycols: Cosmetic Skin Sensitisers After All?

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    Same journal

    Acrylate Copolymers/Crosspolymers in Sunscreens: Minimally Allergenic, Without Evidence of Need for Avoidance by (Meth)Acrylate-Sensitized Individuals.

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    Same journal

    AI-Assisted Automated Two-Stage Patch Test Interpretation System Using Vision Transformer.

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    Same journal

    Use of Tralokinumab in a Hairdresser With Severe Chronic Hand Eczema and Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    Same journal

    Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Cyclohexyl Diethanolamine in a Metalworking Fluid.

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    Same journal

    Fragrance and Preservative Contact Allergens in Cosmetic and Household Cleaning Products in Turkey: Variation by Target Population, Product Type and Manufacturing Origin.

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    See all related articles

    The chamber test is effective for photoepicutaneous testing, offering a reliable method for evaluating skin reactions to light and substances. This technique ensures consistent results by dividing test sites for controlled ultraviolet exposure and dark comparison.

    Area of Science:

    • Dermatology
    • Allergy Testing
    • Photobiology

    Background:

    • Epicutaneous testing is a standard method for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis.
    • Photoepicutaneous testing evaluates skin reactions to substances exposed to ultraviolet (UV) light.
    • Existing methods for photoepicutaneous testing may lack standardization or reliability.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To assess the suitability of the chamber test for photoepicutaneous testing.
    • To develop a simple and reliable method for photoepicutaneous testing.
    • To evaluate the influence of test substance concentration on reaction outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • The chamber test, previously used for epicutaneous testing, was adapted for photoepicutaneous testing.
    • A novel method involved dividing excised test areas into two halves: one for UV irradiation and one for dark control.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Standardized procedures were employed to ensure reproducibility.

    • Main Results:

    • The chamber test proved suitable for photoepicutaneous testing.
    • The developed method demonstrated reliability and simplicity.
    • Variations in test substance amounts affected reaction size but not the intensity of the response.

    Conclusions:

    • The chamber test is a viable and effective tool for photoepicutaneous testing.
    • The described method provides a reliable approach for assessing photoallergic reactions.
    • This technique allows for consistent evaluation of skin's response to UV-exposed substances.