Equitable service provision: a feasibility study of the common waiting lists model

R Madhok1

  • 1South Tees Health Authority, Middlesbrough, UK.

Insights

Implementing common waiting lists for routine surgeries can reduce patient inequity and improve efficiency. A pilot study found no significant differences in case severity between surgeons, supporting this approach for high-volume procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Surgical Outcomes
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Long waiting lists for surgical procedures remain a persistent challenge for healthcare systems.
  • Current referral practices lead to significant variations in waiting times based on consultant choice.
  • Healthcare reforms have inadvertently created a two-tiered service, exacerbating inequities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility and impact of common waiting lists for high-volume routine surgical procedures.
  • To assess case severity differences among surgeons performing specific procedures.
  • To explore strategies for improving equity and efficiency in surgical patient pathways.

Main Methods:

  • A pilot study was conducted for arthroscopic knee examination and inguinal hernia repair.
  • Case severity was compared between patients referred to different general and orthopaedic surgeons.
  • The proportion of procedures performed by middle-grade doctors was analyzed.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant differences in case severity were found between patients of different surgeons.
  • A substantial number of operations were performed by middle-grade doctors.
  • Current waiting times vary considerably, leading to inequitable patient experiences.

Conclusions:

  • Common waiting lists at the departmental level are a viable solution for routine surgical procedures.
  • This model promotes equitable access to care and has the potential to increase operational efficiency.
  • Serious consideration should be given to implementing common waiting lists to address systemic inequities.