Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cell culture methods for testing biocompatibility.

A Pizzoferrato1, G Ciapetti, S Stea

  • 1Laboratory for Biocompatibility Research on Implant Materials, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

Clinical Materials
|December 9, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Osteosarcopenia in hip fracture: taking cues from pathophysiology for clinical practice.

Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents·2021
Same author

Change in FGF-2 circulating levels after arterial embolization in patients with bone metastases.

Neoplasma·2018
Same author

Silver nanoparticles synthesized and coated with pectin: An ideal compromise for anti-bacterial and anti-biofilm action combined with wound-healing properties.

Journal of colloid and interface science·2017
Same author

Association between markers of bone loss and urinary lithogenic risk factors in osteopenic postmenopausal women.

Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents·2016
Same author

Metal hypersensitivity testing in patients undergoing joint replacement: a systematic review.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012
Same author

Orthopaedic research in italy: state of the art.

International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology·2011
Same journal

Product liability implications of biomaterials in the United States.

Clinical materials·1993
Same journal

Biocompatibility evaluation of laser-induced AAm and HEMA grafted EPR. Part 1: In-vitro study.

Clinical materials·1993
Same journal

Early effects of the self-reinforced PGA implant on a growing bone: an experimental study on growing rats.

Clinical materials·1993
Same journal

Bone formation and remodeling around implanted materials under load-bearing conditions.

Clinical materials·1993
Same journal

The effects of lactic acid on PGE2 production by macrophages and human synovial fibroblasts: a possible explanation for problems associated with the degradation of poly(lactide) implants?

Clinical materials·1993
Same journal

Glassy carbon implant as a bone graft substitute: an experimental study on rabbits.

Clinical materials·1993
See all related articles

Cell culture systems offer a reliable in vitro method for testing prosthetic material biocompatibility, reducing animal use. These advanced cell-based assays evaluate cytotoxicity and cytocompatibility, aiding biomaterial development.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Cell Biology
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • In vitro cell culture models are increasingly important for biomaterial testing.
  • Growing concerns about animal testing drive the development of alternative methods.
  • Cell culture systems provide a valuable alternative to traditional animal testing for biomaterials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the literature on cell culture models for evaluating biomaterial biocompatibility.
  • To present the authors' experience using cell culture systems for biomaterial assessment.
  • To highlight the utility of cell culture in understanding tissue-material interactions.

Main Methods:

  • Review of published literature on cell culture-based biocompatibility testing.
  • Application of various in vitro assays to assess cytotoxicity and cytocompatibility.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Long-term use of cell culture systems for diverse biomaterial evaluation purposes.

    • Main Results:

    • Cell culture systems are valuable for pre-clinical biocompatibility testing of prosthetic materials.
    • In vitro methods offer predictive, quantitative, simple, and reliable assessments.
    • Established methods can measure both cytotoxicity and specific cytocompatibility.

    Conclusions:

    • Cell culture models are essential for evaluating biomaterial biocompatibility and reducing animal testing.
    • These systems are useful for screening new materials and studying mechanisms of interaction.
    • The authors' extensive experience supports the reliability and versatility of cell culture in biomaterial science.