Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A method evaluation decision chart (MEDx chart) for judging method performance.

J O Westgard1

  • 1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison 53792, USA.

Clinical Laboratory Science : Journal of the American Society for Medical Technology
|August 6, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Models for combining random and systematic errors. assumptions and consequences for different models.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2001
Same author

Electronic quality control, the total testing process, and the total quality control system.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2001
Same author

The need for a system of quality standards for modern quality management.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation·2000
Same author

Points of care in using statistics in method comparison studies.

Clinical chemistry·1998
Same author

Comparison of NCEP performance specifications for triglycerides, HDL-, and LDL-cholesterol with operating specifications based on NCEP clinical and analytical goals.

Clinical chemistry·1997
Same author

Quality control for qualitative assays: quantitative QC procedure designed to assure analytical quality required for an ELISA of hepatitis B surface antigen.

Clinical chemistry·1997
Same journal

Evaluation of Diverse Health Professionals' Learning Experience in a Continuing Education Activity for Quality Practices in Molecular Genetic Testing.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2019
Same journal

Guidelines for Initiating a Research Agenda: Research Design and Dissemination of Results.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2015
Same journal

Guidelines for Initiating a Research Agenda: Topic Selection and Evidence of Impact.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2015
Same journal

Autonomy and Privacy in Clinical Laboratory Science Policy and Practice.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2015
Same journal

The Value of Clinical Laboratory Sciences Research.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2015
Same journal

From Technical Assistants to Critical Thinkers: From World War II to 2014.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2015
See all related articles

A new Method Evaluation Decision Chart offers a quick and easy way to objectively assess method performance. This graphical tool aids in classifying performance as poor, marginal, good, or excellent using operating specifications charts.

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Laboratory Science

Background:

  • Method performance evaluation is crucial for reliable scientific results.
  • Current decision-making processes can be subjective and time-consuming.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel graphical tool, the Method Evaluation Decision Chart.
  • To enhance the objectivity and efficiency of method performance assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized scientific literature and mathematical models.
  • Incorporated the author's practical experience in method development.
  • Developed a graphical chart for performance classification.

Main Results:

  • The chart establishes a clear relationship with operating specifications (OPSpecs) charts.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance is categorized into four levels: poor, marginal, good, and excellent.
  • Demonstrates a straightforward approach to performance classification.

    • Conclusions:

    • The Method Evaluation Decision Chart facilitates rapid and objective decisions on method performance.
    • Implementation of this tool streamlines the evaluation process.
    • Aids researchers and analysts in confidently assessing their methods.