Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biomedical warfare.

M W Serafini

    National Journal
    |January 7, 1997
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Advocacy groups compete for limited research funding, influencing disease cure priorities. Many activists bypass scientists, urging Congress to allocate funds for specific diseases.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same authorSame journal

    Now, the hard part. Medicare has long defied attempts to reform it.

    National journal·1999
    Same authorSame journal

    An overture, again, on health reform.

    National journal·1999
    Same authorSame journal

    Workers of the world, insure!

    National journal·1998
    Same authorSame journal

    HMOs--the good guys again?

    National journal·1998
    Same authorSame journal

    Medicare's exodus. Congress wants more of the elderly in HMOs, but many HMOs don't want more elderly. They say they can't afford to provide benefits, and are calling it quits.

    National journal·1998
    Same author

    The toughest sell in town.

    National journal·1998

    Area of Science:

    • Health policy
    • Medical research funding
    • Disease advocacy

    Background:

    • Competition for scarce research funding is intense among advocacy groups.
    • Advocacy organizations actively seek cures for serious diseases.
    • There is a growing trend of activists influencing research funding decisions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the competition among advocacy groups for research funds.
    • To understand the role of activists in directing research priorities.
    • To analyze the influence of advocacy groups on governmental funding allocation for diseases.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of funding allocation processes for medical research.
    • Review of advocacy group strategies in lobbying for research funds.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of Congressional decision-making in disease research funding.

    • Main Results:

    • Advocacy groups actively compete for limited research dollars.
    • A significant number of activists are influencing funding decisions.
    • Congress is increasingly involved in deciding which diseases receive the most funding.

    Conclusions:

    • The competition for research funds creates a challenging environment for advocacy groups.
    • Activist involvement in funding decisions can shift research priorities.
    • Congressional influence on disease research funding is a critical factor in medical advancements.