Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A democratic decision. No constitutional support for assisted suicide.

L P Burns1

  • 1Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt & Howlett, LLP, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.

Michigan Health & Hospitals
|August 5, 1997
PubMed
Summary

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled state bans on physician-assisted suicide constitutional. Terminally ill adults do not have a federally protected right to physician aid in dying.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The quest for clarity. The ins and outs of an excess benefit transaction.

Michigan health & hospitals·1998
Same author

Hospital joint ventures. IRS focuses on who is in control.

Michigan health & hospitals·1998
Same author

Raising the standard. Federal rules take aim at medical waste incinerators.

Michigan health & hospitals·1998
Same author

Combating billing problems. Regulatory compliance programs offer many benefits.

Michigan health & hospitals·1997
Same author

Physician recruitment incentives.

Michigan health & hospitals·1997
Same author

Worker classifications: the redefined role of the independent contractor.

Michigan health & hospitals·1997

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Bioethics
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Physician-assisted suicide remains a contentious issue in legal and ethical debates.
  • Recent legal challenges have questioned the constitutionality of state-level prohibitions against physician aid in dying.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on state laws banning physician-assisted suicide.
  • To clarify the constitutional rights of terminally ill adults regarding medical aid in dying.

Main Methods:

  • Legal analysis of the Supreme Court's unanimous decision.
  • Review of relevant case law and constitutional interpretations.

Main Results:

  • The United States Supreme Court unanimously upheld the constitutionality of state laws prohibiting physician-assisted suicide.
  • The ruling establishes that terminally ill adults do not possess a constitutional right to physician-assisted dying.

Conclusions:

  • State laws banning physician-assisted suicide are constitutionally sound.
  • The legal landscape affirms the authority of states to regulate or prohibit physician aid in dying.

Related Experiment Videos