Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Putting teeth into a compliance program.

R Snell1, M Dettmann

  • 1University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation, Madison, USA.

Medical Group Management Journal
|August 5, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genetic variation in PLAG1 associates with early life body weight and peripubertal weight and growth in Bos taurus.

Animal genetics·2012
Same author

Danger, danger: compliance documentation as a weapon.

Journal of AHIMA·2005
Same author

Compliance crunch.

Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards·1999
Same author

Interaction between hamartin and tuberin, the TSC1 and TSC2 gene products.

Human molecular genetics·1998
Same author

Open lines of communication.

Hospital peer review·1998
Same author

Neuropathological diagnosis and CAG repeat expansion in Huntington's disease.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·1996

Internal compliance reviews in healthcare institutions need improvement for consistency and effectiveness. A structured 12-step process, supported by physicians and fair discipline, can enhance issue resolution and overall compliance.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Medical Compliance
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Internal compliance review processes are common in healthcare institutions nationwide.
  • Existing review processes often lack consistency and sufficient impact.
  • Effective compliance requires robust methodologies and physician engagement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify key areas for enhancing internal compliance review processes.
  • To propose a structured approach for improving the effectiveness of these reviews.
  • To facilitate smoother issue resolution within healthcare settings.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current internal compliance practices in healthcare.
  • Development of a 12-step procedural framework.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasis on physician support, rigorous research, and fair disciplinary actions.

    • Main Results:

    • A 12-step procedure is proposed to standardize and strengthen internal reviews.
    • Physician involvement is identified as crucial for successful implementation.
    • Fair disciplinary actions are highlighted as essential for accountability.

    Conclusions:

    • Internal compliance reviews can be significantly improved through a systematic approach.
    • A structured 12-step procedure offers a practical solution for enhancing healthcare compliance.
    • Effective implementation requires institutional commitment and physician collaboration.