Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Casting the screening net: separating big fish from little fish.

B A Markham1, B Hutchison, S Birch

  • 1Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
|October 4, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genetic engineering of dinoflagellate algae and the lethality of an introduced plastid terminal oxidase.

Protist·2026
Same author

Planning the future of oral health care workforce: Moving beyond demographic change.

Community dental health·2023
Same author

Modelling a Consultant Workforce for the United Kingdom: needs-based planning for Dental Public Health.

Community dental health·2023
Same author

Abstracts of presentations to the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Canadian Association of General Surgeons Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons: Canadian Surgery Forum, Toronto, Ont., September 6-9, 2007.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2023
Same author

Perioperative management of a parturient with VACTERL association for a caesarean section.

Anaesthesia reports·2023
Same author

Who are the 10%? Characteristics of the populations and communities receiving fluoridated water in England.

Community dental health·2022
Same journal

Basic human values, responsiveness, and dignity in geriatric organizations in Israel: A qualitative study of state regulations.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

A policy analysis of the three-month waiting period for new and returning residents to access provincial health insurance in Ontario, Canada.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Policy priorities in palliative and end-of-life care: An exploration of issues reflected in public strategy.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Advancing stakeholder analysis: Power and participation in health technology assessment policy development in the United Arab Emirates.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Cultural sensitivity concerning the Gaeltacht people of Ireland - a concept analysis.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Israel's 2010 capitation reform and the widening of regional health disparities: A difference-in-differences analysis.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new framework to evaluate medical screening programs based on effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. It categorizes screening into four types to help decision-makers optimize resource allocation.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Preventive Medicine
  • Medical Decision Making

Background:

  • Screening tests are increasingly important in healthcare.
  • Evaluating screening programs requires consideration of effectiveness, efficiency, and equity.
  • Existing literature categorizes screening as universal or opportunistic.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel framework for analyzing and categorizing screening programs.
  • To incorporate the dimension of 'selectivity' into screening program classification.
  • To aid in the systematic development and assessment of screening initiatives.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a framework expanding on universal and opportunistic screening categories.
  • Introduced 'selectivity' as a key dimension, creating four screening categories: active non-selective, active selective, opportunistic non-selective, and opportunistic selective.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applied the framework to categorize screening recommendations for high serum cholesterol.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified four distinct categories of screening programs based on selectivity and approach.
    • Demonstrated the framework's utility using high serum cholesterol screening as a case study.
    • Highlighted that no single screening strategy perfectly balances effectiveness, efficiency, and equity.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed framework offers a systematic approach to evaluating screening programs.
    • It facilitates explicit consideration and balancing of effectiveness, efficiency, and equity in screening.
    • Assists decision-makers in making informed trade-offs for optimal screening program design.