Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical laboratory employment and workload patterns.

K R Karni1

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Medical School, University of Minnesota, USA. karni@maroon.tc.umn.edu

Clinical Laboratory Science : Journal of the American Society for Medical Technology
|August 5, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The influence of perceived professional status on the career progression of CLS graduates.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2001
Same author

Comparing CLS faculty and allied health deans and directors: time spent in academic activities and perceptions of the research environment.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2000
Same author

Scholarly activities among clinical laboratory science faculty.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·1999
Same author

Scholarship and research of allied health deans and directors.

Journal of allied health·1999
Same author

Research productivity and activities of clinical laboratory science faculty: a follow-up study.

Journal of allied health·1998
Same author

Key elements and processes needed in curriculum design.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·1998

Clinical laboratory staffing in the Twin Cities has more than doubled in 25 years, despite hospital closures. Increased testing volume and new diagnostic technologies drove this employment growth in clinical laboratory science.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Laboratory Science
  • Healthcare Management
  • Medical Technology Employment Trends

Background:

  • Employment patterns of clinical laboratory personnel are crucial for workforce planning.
  • Historical data on laboratory staffing in the Minneapolis-St. Paul (Twin Cities) area over 25 years is limited.
  • Understanding these trends informs employers and educators in the field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze changes in the number and types of personnel employed in clinical laboratories in the Twin Cities.
  • To compare laboratory employment data from 1970, 1980, 1990, and 1995.
  • To identify factors influencing laboratory staffing levels and testing volumes.

Main Methods:

  • A survey was distributed to administrators of 28 major laboratories in the Twin Cities area in 1995.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data on personnel numbers and types were collected and compared with historical data from 1970, 1980, and 1990.
  • The study examined changes in hospital beds, laboratory types, and overall testing volume.
  • Main Results:

    • Clinical laboratory personnel in the Twin Cities more than doubled from approximately 1300 in 1970 to 2900 in 1995.
    • Despite a significant decrease in the number of hospitals and hospital beds, laboratory employment increased, particularly after 1980.
    • Increased testing volume (75% of administrators reported more testing in 1995 vs. 1990) and the rise of independent laboratories contributed to employment growth.

    Conclusions:

    • Clinical laboratory employment in the Twin Cities has shown robust growth over 25 years, defying trends of hospital consolidation.
    • Expansion into new diagnostic technologies and increased overall testing volume are key drivers of this growth.
    • Workforce planning in clinical laboratory science must account for evolving healthcare structures and technological advancements.