Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethics and employee benefits.

C M Richardson1

  • 1Fuji Photo Film USA, Inc., Elmsford, NJ, USA.

Benefits Quarterly
|December 8, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article explores ethical dilemmas in employee benefits, offering interpretations of complex situations. It encourages employee benefits professionals to consider various choices when navigating decisions with employees, employers, and insurers.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Invited review: Global census on the development and implementation of direct genetic selection for enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle.

Journal of dairy science·2026
Same author

Development of a Novel Diagnostic Modality for Upper Airway Obstruction in Neonates.

The Laryngoscope·2025
Same author

Exploring sustainability in dairy cattle breeding focusing on feed efficiency and methane emissions.

JDS communications·2024
Same author

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through genetic selection in the Australian dairy industry.

Journal of dairy science·2022
Same author

Estimating methane coefficients to predict the environmental impact of traits in the Australian dairy breeding program.

Journal of dairy science·2021
Same author

Breeding for reduced methane emission and feed-efficient Holstein cows: An international response.

Journal of dairy science·2021
Same journal

How ACA Is Forcing a Technology Revolution.

Benefits quarterly·2018
Same journal

How Employers Are Looking at Specialty Pharmacy Today.

Benefits quarterly·2018
Same journal

Pharmacy Benefit Integration: A Connected Approach to Total Medical Cost Savings.

Benefits quarterly·2018
Same journal

Attention Turns to Specialty Pharmacy.

Benefits quarterly·2018
Same journal

Managing Pharmacy Trend Rates.

Benefits quarterly·2018
Same journal

Challenges Facing U.S. Long-Term Care Financing: Future Needs, Key Issues and Current Solutions.

Benefits quarterly·2018
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Business Ethics
  • Employee Benefits Management
  • Professional Responsibility

Background:

  • The employee benefits profession involves complex interactions between employees, employers, and insurance companies.
  • Ethical considerations are paramount in managing employee benefits, impacting all stakeholders.
  • Existing literature often provides prescriptive ethical guidelines, but nuanced interpretations are needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the multifaceted ethical questions within the employee benefits profession.
  • To explore diverse interpretations of ethical scenarios faced by benefits professionals.
  • To encourage critical thinking about decision-making processes in employee benefits.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of ethical scenarios in employee benefits.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of interpretive frameworks for ethical decision-making.
  • Case study approach to illustrate practical ethical challenges.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified multiple valid interpretations for common ethical dilemmas.
    • Highlighted the subjective nature of ethical decision-making in benefits.
    • Demonstrated the need for ongoing professional dialogue on ethics.

    Conclusions:

    • Employee benefits professionals must navigate ambiguous ethical landscapes.
    • A framework for interpreting ethical situations, rather than rigid rules, is beneficial.
    • Confronting difficult decisions is essential for upholding professional integrity.