Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A framework for improving quality. Using project study teams, Providence Health System tackles problem areas.

M R London1, C D Klug

  • 1Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Providence Health System, Portland, OR, USA.

Health Progress (Saint Louis, Mo.)
|February 6, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Quality improvement initiatives utilize evidence-based projects and data to enhance patient care processes and outcomes. Organizations like Providence Health System (PHS) implement structured programs for continuous monitoring and advancement.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment of pain in cognitively impaired older adults: a comparison of pain assessment tools and their use by nonprofessional caregivers.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2000
Same author

Physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST): outcomes in a PACE program. Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2000
Same author

Correlation between health outcome and length of hospital stay in lumbar microdiscectomy.

Spine·1998
Same author

Insights into asthma prevalence in Oregon.

The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma·1998
Same author

Clinical practice evaluation at Providence Health System.

Quality management in health care·1997
Same author

Measuring the success of treatment in patient terms.

Medical care·1995

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Quality Improvement Science
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Organizations require clear mission and objectives for effective quality improvement.
  • Internal measurements, self-examination, external accountability, and benchmarks guide project selection.
  • Projects focus on care processes, outcomes, service frequency, or patient populations, supported by evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify quality improvement and monitoring issues within a healthcare system.
  • To implement structured projects for enhancing patient care and operational efficiency.
  • To integrate quality improvement across a continuum of care.

Main Methods:

  • Articulating service mission and objectives.
  • Selecting manageable projects using internal/external data and benchmarks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Forming multidisciplinary teams to review evidence, define metrics, and develop evaluation plans.
  • Utilizing quality study groups (e.g., CORE) and guideline evaluation (e.g., GEAR) projects.
  • Conducting feasibility studies for patient populations (e.g., PHI teams).

    • Main Results:

    • Providence Health System (PHS) integrated care through quality study groups and improved communication.
    • Guideline Evaluation and Redesign (GEAR) projects compared PHS performance against external standards for eight patient conditions, aiming to reduce hospital days.
    • Population Health Improvement (PHI) teams identified care improvements using internal/external evidence, with specific redesigns in high-risk pregnancy and risk screens for Medicare/Medicaid patients.

    Conclusions:

    • Structured quality improvement projects, utilizing evidence and multidisciplinary teams, can lead to significant enhancements in healthcare processes and patient outcomes.
    • The integration of quality initiatives across different clinical programs and patient populations is crucial for system-wide advancement.
    • Benchmarking against external standards and developing specific guidelines contribute to reducing resource utilization without compromising care quality.