Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Report cards: Part II--Providers rating MCOs.

J G Kaplan1

  • 1Heritage New York Medical Group, Garden City, USA.

Managed Care Interface
|December 8, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Confidence in confidentiality and the role of the privacy officer.

Managed care interface·2001
Same author

Managed care report cards: evaluating those who evaluate physicians.

Managed care interface·2001
Same author

The report card's role in health care decision making: Part I.

Managed care interface·1997
Same author

Managing costs may threaten managing care.

Cost & quality quarterly journal : CQ·1997
Same author

The net present value of investments in health.

Medical interface·1996
Same author

Depreciation in health care.

Medical interface·1996
Same journal

Changes in hospital readmissions for diabetes-related conditions. Differences by payer.

Managed care interface·2008
Same journal

Heart disease and managed care.

Managed care interface·2008
Same journal

A conversation with James K. Min, MD.

Managed care interface·2008
Same journal

Acute coronary syndromes.

Managed care interface·2008
Same journal

Improving outcomes in cardiovascular disease.

Managed care interface·2008
Same journal

The effect for oncology of the national coverage determination for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

Managed care interface·2008
See all related articles

Physicians should rate health plans to improve healthcare quality comparisons. This offers a new perspective for consumers and government, aiding informed contracting decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Quality Improvement
  • Healthcare Policy

Background:

  • Health plan and physician report cards are vital for assessing healthcare quality.
  • Consumers and government increasingly rely on these comparative metrics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce the concept of physicians rating health plans.
  • To explore how physician evaluations can inform health plan contracting.

Main Methods:

  • This article presents a conceptual framework.
  • It synthesizes existing literature on healthcare quality measurement.

Main Results:

  • Physician ratings offer a unique perspective on health plan performance.
  • This approach complements existing consumer and government-focused report cards.

Related Experiment Videos

Conclusions:

  • Physician-led health plan ratings can enhance transparency and accountability.
  • This method provides valuable insights for optimizing healthcare delivery and contracting.