Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Refurbished medical equipment.

M E Donawa1

  • 1Donawa and Associates Ltd, Rome, Italy. donawa@srd.it

Medical Device Technology
|March 8, 1998
PubMed
Summary

European and US regulations for medical device refurbishers are discussed. The article highlights gaps in European directives and reviews US proposed rule-making for refurbishing medical equipment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

New FDA draft guidance on premarket submissions.

Medical device technology·2000
Same author

The quality planning conundrum.

Medical device technology·2000
Same author

Drug delivery: the strategic advantage of design controls.

Medical device technology·1999
Same author

Use and recognition of consensus standards in US premarket submissions.

Medical device technology·1999
Same author

An improved draft guidance to process validation.

Medical device technology·1999
Same author

Avoiding unreasonable reliance on subcontractor certification.

Medical device technology·1999

Area of Science:

  • Regulatory Affairs
  • Medical Device Engineering
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • European medical device Directives apply to full refurbishers who rebrand equipment.
  • Current European regulations do not cover other forms of medical device refurbishment.
  • Significant differences exist in regulatory approaches between Europe and the US.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze and compare European and United States regulatory frameworks for medical device refurbishers.
  • To identify ambiguities and potential challenges within existing regulations.
  • To discuss emerging regulatory developments in the US concerning refurbishment.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of European Directives and US FDA regulations.
  • Review of relevant legal documents and proposed rule-making notices.
  • Discussion of regulatory implications for medical device refurbishing businesses.

Main Results:

  • European regulations specifically target full refurbishers, leaving other refurbishment models unaddressed.
  • The US is actively considering new regulations for medical device refurbishers.
  • Discrepancies in regulatory scope and requirements create complexity for international refurbishers.

Conclusions:

  • There is a need for clearer and more comprehensive regulations for medical device refurbishment globally.
  • The US advance notice of proposed rulemaking indicates a move towards greater regulatory oversight.
  • Harmonization of regulations could benefit the medical device refurbishment industry and patient safety.

Related Experiment Videos