Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A practical guide to preemption for self-insured plans.

A M Wallace1

  • 1Segal Company, New York, USA.

Benefits Quarterly
|December 8, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Salivary Testosterone Levels and Health Status in Men and Women in the British General Population: Findings from the Third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3).

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2016
Same author

Combined preputial advancement and phallopexy as a revision technique for treating paraphimosis in a dog.

Australian veterinary journal·2014
Same author

Total knee replacement in a dog with a non-union type B3 tibial plateau fracture.

Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology : V.C.O.T·2014
Same author

A novel method for defining the Greyhound talocrural joint axis of rotation for hinged transarticular external skeletal fixation.

Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology : V.C.O.T·2013
Same author

An ex vivo investigation of the effect of the TATE canine elbow arthroplasty system on kinematics of the elbow.

The Journal of small animal practice·2013
Same author

Ex vivo evaluation of the biomechanical effect of varying monocortical screw numbers on a plate-rod canine femoral gap model.

Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology : V.C.O.T·2013
Same journal

How ACA Is Forcing a Technology Revolution.

Benefits quarterly·2018
Same journal

How Employers Are Looking at Specialty Pharmacy Today.

Benefits quarterly·2018
Same journal

Pharmacy Benefit Integration: A Connected Approach to Total Medical Cost Savings.

Benefits quarterly·2018
Same journal

Attention Turns to Specialty Pharmacy.

Benefits quarterly·2018
Same journal

Managing Pharmacy Trend Rates.

Benefits quarterly·2018
Same journal

Challenges Facing U.S. Long-Term Care Financing: Future Needs, Key Issues and Current Solutions.

Benefits quarterly·2018
See all related articles

Federal law often preempts state regulations for self-insured health plans. Recent court cases clarify the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) preemption, influencing state-level plan guidelines.

Area of Science:

  • Health Law
  • Employee Benefits Law
  • Federal Preemption Doctrine

Background:

  • Self-insured health plans operate under specific federal regulations.
  • State laws attempting to regulate these plans often face preemption challenges.
  • Understanding the scope of federal preemption is crucial for plan administrators and policymakers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the legal landscape of federal preemption over state regulation of self-insured plans.
  • To examine recent case law impacting ERISA preemption.
  • To identify how judicial decisions shape future state regulatory guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • Review of four significant legal cases challenging ERISA preemption.
  • Analysis of judicial reasoning and conclusions in each case.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Synthesis of case outcomes to identify emerging regulatory trends.

    • Main Results:

    • Federal law, specifically ERISA, significantly preempts state regulations concerning self-insured plans.
    • Recent litigation has tested the boundaries of ERISA preemption, leading to nuanced legal interpretations.
    • Court decisions are actively informing the development of state-specific guidelines for ERISA plans.

    Conclusions:

    • The interpretation of ERISA preemption continues to evolve through litigation.
    • States are adapting their regulatory approaches in response to judicial decisions on preemption.
    • Clearer guidelines are emerging for the regulation of self-insured plans within the framework of federal law.