Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Case study. Does this company need a union?

C Von Hoffman

    Harvard Business Review
    |April 7, 1998
    PubMed
    Summary

    Employee perspectives differ significantly within Wellington Associates. While analysts enjoy top pay and benefits, support staff face low raises, limited promotions, and inadequate benefits, leading to union organizing.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same journal

    The Case for Capitation.

    Harvard business review·2016
    Same journal

    How to Pay for Health Care.

    Harvard business review·2016
    Same journal

    How to Preempt Team Conflict.

    Harvard business review·2016
    Same journal

    The Secrets of Great Teamwork.

    Harvard business review·2016
    Same journal

    Leading the Team You Inherit.

    Harvard business review·2016
    Same journal

    Wicked Problem Solvers.

    Harvard business review·2016

    Area of Science:

    • Human Resources Management
    • Organizational Behavior
    • Labor Relations

    Background:

    • Wellington Associates, a high-tech consulting firm, was perceived by management as an excellent workplace with competitive analyst compensation and extensive benefits.
    • A union organizing effort revealed a starkly different reality for the support staff, highlighting significant disparities in pay, benefits, and working conditions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the contrasting perceptions of workplace conditions between management and support staff at Wellington Associates.
    • To analyze the factors contributing to support staff dissatisfaction and the initiation of union organizing activities.
    • To explore potential strategies and legal obligations for the company in response to the unionization efforts.

    Main Methods:

    • Case study analysis of Wellington Associates.
    • Examination of employee compensation, benefits, and work-life balance policies from both analyst and support staff perspectives.
    • Review of union organizing activities and management's initial responses.

    Main Results:

    • Support staff compensation includes low annual raises (2-3%) and infrequent promotions to professional roles.
    • Benefit disparities are evident, with higher relative costs for medical, dental, and on-site daycare for support staff.
    • Work-life balance issues arise from flextime impracticalities and the requirement to accommodate analyst schedules, impacting support staff negatively.

    Conclusions:

    • A significant gap exists in perceived workplace quality between management and support staff at Wellington Associates.
    • The findings underscore the importance of equitable benefit distribution and flexible policies that accommodate all employee levels.
    • Addressing support staff grievances is crucial for mitigating labor disputes and fostering a more inclusive work environment.

    Related Experiment Videos