Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Patient waiting times in a physician's office.

J P Meza1

  • 1Department of Family Practice, Henry Ford Medical Group, St. Clair Shores, MI 48080, USA.

The American Journal of Managed Care
|April 7, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Optimizing physician scheduling templates significantly reduces patient wait times and appointment durations. Shorter, punctual sessions accommodating extra patients improve patient flow and satisfaction.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient preferences for laboratory test results notification.

The American journal of managed care·2001
Same author

Constipation in the elderly patient.

The Journal of family practice·1984
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Primary Care
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Patient waiting times are a significant concern in primary care settings.
  • Inefficient scheduling templates can lead to prolonged waits and decreased patient satisfaction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of different scheduling templates on patient waiting times and appointment durations.
  • To identify scheduling variables that correlate with patient waiting times.

Main Methods:

  • An observational study analyzed 1783 appointments for a single family practice physician.
  • Four sequential groups used varying scheduling templates (15-minute and 20-minute base intervals).
  • Analysis of variance and correlation coefficients were used to compare groups and identify relationships.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences in waiting times (F=34.14, P<0.001) and appointment durations (F=37.37, P<0.001) were observed across scheduling groups.
  • The optimal schedule resulted in a mean waiting time of 17.33 minutes and mean appointment duration of 17.99 minutes.
  • Waiting time correlated significantly with queue length, session start lateness, patients per hour, and patients per session.

Conclusions:

  • Both scheduling template design and patient flow dynamics significantly influence patient waiting times.
  • Shorter, punctual appointment sessions that allow for flexibility to accommodate additional patients are recommended.
  • Optimizing schedules can reduce actual wait times and manage patient perception of waiting, thereby minimizing dissatisfaction.

Related Experiment Videos