Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Perfusion services national process improvement benchmarking.

J B Riley1, T A Kavanaugh

  • 1Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.

The Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology
|February 6, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sampling and inversion of data in diffraction particle sizing.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Microemboli detection on extracorporeal bypass circuits.

Perfusion·2008
Same author

The impact of the Stark II final rule on nephrologists.

Nephrology news & issues·2002
Same author

Patient's rights in receiving or rejecting dialysis care.

Nephrology news & issues·2002
Same author

Tell your stories ... spread your healing presence. An interview with Julia Balzer Riley, MN RN.

NASNewsletter·2002
Same author

A fax-back oxygenator-perfusionist clinical performance data collection and statistical analysis method.

The journal of extra-corporeal technology·1999
Same journal

Corrigendum to: High pressure excursion in a radial design oxygenator.

The journal of extra-corporeal technology·2026
Same journal

Understanding pressure excursions in extracorporeal technologies: The role of shear stress and hematologic predisposition.

The journal of extra-corporeal technology·2026
Same journal

Toward standardized guidelines for distal perfusion cannulae in V-A ECMO and ECPELLA: timing, sizing, monitoring, and management.

The journal of extra-corporeal technology·2026
Same journal

Ventricular assist device simulation to improve staff confidence and knowledge when caring for patients supported with the Berlin heart☆.

The journal of extra-corporeal technology·2026
Same journal

Strategic decision-making for redo cardiac surgical patients with biventricular heart failure - description of a surgical technique.

The journal of extra-corporeal technology·2026
Same journal

Learning from a pitfall: Atrial septostomy in LV failure under VA-ECMO for pulmonary hypertension.

The journal of extra-corporeal technology·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a national benchmarking system for perfusion services, enabling peer comparison of patient care outcomes. This process facilitates quality improvement by comparing local data to national results, enhancing patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Perfusion Services Management
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • The Joint Commission recommends benchmarking for quality improvement in healthcare.
  • Benchmarking involves comparing an organization's patient care outcomes to industry best practices.
  • Effective benchmarking requires robust data collection and analysis systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a national benchmarking process for perfusion patient services.
  • To facilitate peer comparison of process improvement indicators.
  • To support quality enhancement through outcome measurement.

Main Methods:

  • A databasing communication applet was developed within a perfusion service management software.
  • Clinical sites entered patient-specific numeric data and yes/no queries post-procedure.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Local data was transmitted via modem for comparison with a national database, ensuring anonymity.

    • Main Results:

    • Nine institutions contributed data from over 6,425 cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedures.
    • National and institutional means for six CPB outcome parameters were compared.
    • Comparison of 'yes' responses to four procedure-related questions was performed.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed system successfully implements Joint Commission-recommended benchmarking.
    • National benchmarking allows for effective peer comparison of perfusion services outcomes.
    • This process aids in improving patient care through outcome-based quality initiatives.