Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

The red blood cell utilization review experience.

S W Renner1

  • 1Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Department, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA.

Transfusion Science
|February 6, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Peer review of blood transfusions, established in 1984, often finds over 90% appropriateness. This comprehensive process rarely identifies opportunities for improvement due to a low number of inappropriate transfusions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differential effects of low-level lead exposure on the natural isozymes of erythrocyte 5'-nucleotidase.

Clinical biochemistry·1999
Same author

An annotated bibliography on autologous transfusion: second edition.

Transfusion·1998
Same author

Reasons for proficiency testing failures in clinical chemistry and blood gas analysis: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study in 665 laboratories.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1996
Same author

Procurement and transfusion of human immunodeficiency virus-positive or untested autologous blood units: issues and concerns: a report prepared by the Autologous Transfusion Committee of the American Association of Blood Banks.

Transfusion·1995
Same author

The use of Q-Probes in modifying transfusion practice.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1994
Same author

Hemolytic anemia associated with lead poisoning from shotgun pellets and the response to Succimer treatment.

American journal of hematology·1993
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality
  • Medical Peer Review
  • Transfusion Medicine

Background:

  • The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations introduced a comprehensive peer-review process for blood transfusions in 1984.
  • This process involves retrospective, bi-level, chart-based review with initial screening and physician evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of the established peer-review process for blood transfusions.
  • To determine if the current peer-review system effectively identifies areas for improvement in transfusion practices.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and evaluation of studies assessing the blood transfusion peer-review process.
  • Analysis of transfusion appropriateness rates and identification of inappropriate cases across multiple studies.

Main Results:

  • In two-thirds of evaluated studies, over 90% of blood transfusions were deemed appropriate.
  • Most reporting hospitals documented no instances of inappropriate transfusions.
  • The peer-review process frequently yielded too few inappropriate cases to readily identify improvement opportunities.

Conclusions:

  • The current comprehensive peer-review system for blood transfusions is often highly effective in ensuring appropriate usage.
  • The process's efficacy in identifying improvement opportunities is limited by the low incidence of inappropriate transfusions.
  • Further refinement of peer-review methodologies may be needed to better pinpoint areas for enhancing transfusion safety and efficiency.

Related Experiment Videos