Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2026

10:26
Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Matching anonymous pre-posttests using subject-generated information
J McGloin1, S Holcomb, D S Main
1Center for Studies in Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, USA.
Evaluation Review
|November 3, 1996
Summary
Anonymous questionnaires are vital for sensitive research. A new subject-generated coding system accurately matched 75.2% of pretest-posttest pairs, proving effective for maintaining confidentiality in studies.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Research Methodology
- Data Collection
Background:
- Anonymous questionnaires are crucial for sensitive research topics.
- Accurately matching pretests with posttests is challenging in anonymous studies.
- The accuracy of existing subject-generated coding schemes is largely unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of a subject-generated coding system for matching pretests and posttests in an anonymous study.
- To determine the effectiveness of subject-generated codes in maintaining participant confidentiality.
- To assess the feasibility of using such coding systems in research involving sensitive issues.
Main Methods:
- Conducted an anonymous study with 745 students.
- Implemented a subject-generated coding system for pretest-posttest matching.
- Verified coding accuracy using an anonymous sticker identification system.
Main Results:
- The subject-generated coding system achieved an accurate match rate of 75.2% for pretest-posttest pairs.
- 22.1% of pairs remained unmatched.
- Incorrect matches occurred in only 2.7% of cases.
Conclusions:
- Subject-generated coding systems are effective for matching pretests and posttests in anonymous research.
- These systems significantly enhance confidentiality, which is critical for sensitive research.
- The sticker identification system provides a reliable method for verifying coding accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Blind Procedures
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Study Design in Statistics
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Randomized Experiments
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
McNemar's Test
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...

