Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Documenting community-level outcomes. Lessons from drinking and driving.

R B Voas1, J Lange, A J Treno

  • 1National Public Service Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Evaluation Review
|March 8, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Search for decays of stopped long-lived particles produced in proton-proton collisions at [Formula: see text].

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
Same author

Measurement of the inclusive 3-jet production differential cross section in proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV and determination of the strong coupling constant in the TeV range.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
Same author

Measurement of electroweak production of two jets in association with a Z boson in proton-proton collisions at [Formula: see text].

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
Same author

Measurement of the relative prompt production rate of <i>χ</i><sub>c2</sub> and <i>χ</i><sub>c1</sub> in pp collisions at [Formula: see text].

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
Same author

Jet and underlying event properties as a function of charged-particle multiplicity in proton-proton collisions at [Formula: see text].

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
Same author

Measurement of the sum of WW and WZ production with W+dijet events in pp collisions at [Formula: see text].

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
Same journal

Brokerage, Gender, and Academic Performance in Interdisciplinary Co-Authorship Networks: A Study of Policy-Related Social Learning Publications.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Peer-led Support Groups for Parents Following Child Removal: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Teacher-AI Collaboration to Support Assessment and Feedback: A Case Study in Norwegian Secondary Education.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Green Policies for the Circular Economy and Entrepreneurship: International Evidence.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Transparency, Ethical Framing, and User Agency as Determinants of Trust in AI-Mediated Assessment: Informing the Design of Trustworthy Systems.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

No Evidence that Banning the Purchase of Sex Increases Rape: A Replication Study of Ciacci (2024, 2025).

Evaluation review·2026
See all related articles

Alcohol-related crashes are common on weekend evenings. Roadside surveys better identify high-risk drivers than telephone surveys, though telephone surveys reveal many drivers at high-risk times who avoid dangerous locations.

Area of Science:

  • Traffic safety research
  • Epidemiology of alcohol-related incidents

Background:

  • Alcohol-related crashes disproportionately occur on Friday and Saturday evenings.
  • Understanding driver demographics during high-risk periods is crucial for prevention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare demographic characteristics of drivers during high-risk weekend evenings versus other times.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of Random Digit Dialing Telephone Surveys versus Roadside Voluntary Breath Test Surveys in identifying at-risk drivers.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of data from telephone surveys and roadside breath tests.
  • Analysis of driver demographics based on time and location of driving.
  • Roadside surveys conducted at high-alcohol-crash locations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Roadside surveys provide a superior sample of drivers at high risk for crash involvement.
  • Telephone surveys identify individuals driving during high-risk times but avoiding high-risk locations.
  • Demographic differences exist between drivers at high-risk times and those not.

Conclusions:

  • Roadside surveys are more effective for identifying drivers most at risk of alcohol-related crashes.
  • Telephone surveys can identify drivers engaging in risky behavior (driving at high-risk times) but not necessarily high-risk locations.