Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validating quality indicators. Quality as relationship between structure, process, and outcome.

M S Salzer1, C T Nixon, L J Schut

  • 1Center for Mental Health Policy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA.

Evaluation Review
|May 7, 1997
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a framework for validating mental health care quality indicators. Adopting this framework ensures accurate quality measurement, aiding continuous improvement and informed decision-making for purchasers and consumers.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adopting innovations--lessons learned from a peer-based hospital diversion program.

Community mental health journal·2001
Same author

Measuring mental health outcomes with pre-post designs.

The journal of behavioral health services & research·2001
Same author

Looking for the disorder in conduct disorder.

Journal of abnormal psychology·2001
Same author

Refining the costs analyses of the Fort Bragg evaluation: the impact of cost offset and cost shifting.

Mental health services research·2001
Same author

Child sexual abuse II: treatment.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2001
Same author

The co-occurrence of psychiatric and substance use diagnoses in adolescents in different service systems: frequency, recognition, cost, and outcomes.

The journal of behavioral health services & research·2000

Area of Science:

  • Mental Health Services Research
  • Health Services Administration
  • Quality Improvement Science

Background:

  • Growing interest in evaluating mental health care quality.
  • Current use of unvalidated quality indicators.
  • Gap between theory/research and practical quality assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To offer a framework for validating mental health care quality indicators.
  • To promote the use of valid indicators for quality measurement.
  • To support continuous quality improvement in mental health agencies.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptualizing quality as the relationship between service structures, processes, and outcomes.
  • Developing a systematic approach for indicator validation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Reviewing existing literature on quality measurement in mental health.

    • Main Results:

    • A proposed framework for validating quality indicators.
    • Emphasis on the link between structural, process, and outcome measures.
    • Potential for improved accuracy in quality assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • Adoption of the framework facilitates valid quality measurement.
    • Valid quality indicators aid continuous quality improvement efforts.
    • Informed purchasers and consumers benefit from reliable quality data.