Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Inspector General wins round two of Hanlester Case.

J C Dechene

    The Medical Staff Counselor
    |January 3, 1993
    PubMed
    Summary

    The Hanlester Network decision clarifies joint venture fraud and abuse risks for physicians. Understanding these factors and safe harbors is crucial for compliant physician investment in healthcare ventures.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    QMHC interview with James C. Dechene, JD.

    Quality management in health care·2000
    Same author

    Lab discounts. How deep is too deep?

    CAP today·2000
    Same author

    "Stark II" and state self-referral restrictions.

    Journal of health and hospital law : a publication of the American Academy of Hospital Attorneys of the American Hospital Association·1996
    Same author

    Preferred provider organization structures and agreements.

    Annals of health law·1994
    Same author

    Physician and provider obligations under the Medicare antidumping provision.

    The Medical staff counselor·1991
    Same author

    Physician and provider obligations under the Medicare antidumping provisions.

    Alabama medicine : journal of the Medical Association of the State of Alabama·1990

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Law
    • Fraud and Abuse Regulations
    • Physician Investment

    Background:

    • The Inspector General v. Hanlester Network decision by the HHS Departmental Appeals Board Appellate Division addresses concerns regarding joint ventures.
    • It identifies specific factors that may indicate an improper purpose in healthcare joint ventures, particularly those involving physician investment.

    Framework:

    • The decision, alongside existing fraud and abuse safe harbors, provides a framework for evaluating the legality of joint ventures.
    • This framework helps stakeholders identify potential legal pitfalls associated with physician investment in joint ventures.

    Implementation:

    • The article analyzes the latest Hanlester decision and its implications for healthcare joint ventures.
    • It forecasts the future landscape of joint venturing in light of this decision and the established safe harbors.

    Implications:

    • Provides guidance for potential investors navigating the complexities of physician investment in joint ventures.
    • Aims to help healthcare professionals avoid fraud and abuse concerns when structuring or investing in joint ventures.

    Related Experiment Videos