Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

Harvesting Venom Toxins from Assassin Bugs and Other Heteropteran Insects
Published on: April 21, 2018
Inspector General wins round two of Hanlester Case
Abstract:
The decision of the HHS Departmental Appeals Board Appellate Division in Inspector General v. Hanlester Network provides guidance as to the aspects of joint ventures that pose fraud and abuse concerns by listing the factors that may indicate an improper purpose. Together with the fraud and abuse safe harbors, the decision helps identify the pitfalls associated with physician investment in suspect joint ventures. This article analyzes the latest Hanlester decision, forecasts the future of joint venturing after Hanlester and the safe harbors, and offers some guidance to potential investors in light of these developments.
Related Concept Videos
Robbers Cave
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...
Torts II
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Quality Assurance
Cochran's Q Test

