Related Experiment Videos
Can the well trained EMT-paramedic maintain skills and knowledge?
JACEP
|December 1, 1976
Summary
Assessing emergency medical technician (EMT)-paramedic competence can utilize patient outcomes as reliable indicators. A pulseless, non-breathing patient tracer condition showed 31% resuscitation and 14% save rates.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Medical Education
- Healthcare Quality Assurance
Background:
- Established criteria exist for evaluating individual and team competence among emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and paramedics.
- Current assessment methods include written/oral exams, skill evaluations, and physician observation of patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the use of tracer conditions reflecting patient outcomes for assessing EMT-paramedic team competence.
- To determine the effectiveness of using specific patient conditions as tracers for team performance.
Main Methods:
- Utilized standard definitions for "resuscitation" and "save" in emergency care scenarios.
- Employed the pulseless, non-breathing patient as a specific "tracer condition" to evaluate team performance.
- Calculated patient outcomes based on a standard base population per unit time.
Main Results:
- Out of 241 patients, 75 (31%) were successfully resuscitated.
- A total of 34 (14%) patients were classified as "saved."
- The study demonstrated that tracer conditions can yield quantifiable data on team competence.
Conclusions:
- EMT-paramedic team competence can be reliably assessed using tracer conditions linked to patient outcomes.
- The pulseless, non-breathing patient scenario serves as a valid tracer for evaluating resuscitation and save rates.
- Further research can identify additional appropriate tracers for assessing team manipulative skill competence.