Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Carpal tunnel decompression: open vs endoscopic.

T D Tennent1, N J Goddard

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Free Hospital, London.

British Journal of Hospital Medicine
|April 8, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ipsilateral total shoulder and elbow prosthetic replacement in a patient with severe haemophilia B.

Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia·2016
Same author

Absorption spectroscopy in microfluidic flow cells using a metal clad leaky waveguide device with a porous gel waveguide layer.

The Analyst·2012
Same author

Consensus recommendations for the use of FEIBA(®) in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors undergoing elective orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic surgery.

Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia·2012
Same author

Perioperative clotting factor replacement and infection in total knee arthroplasty.

Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia·2011
Same author

Factor IX replacement to cover total knee replacement surgery in haemophilia B: a single-centre experience, 2000-2010.

Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia·2011
Same author

Tunable optical filter for colorimetric applications.

Applied optics·2010
Same journal

Cost-effective monotherapy of concomitant benign prostatic hyperplasia and hypertension.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
Same journal

Liposarcoma: a review of current diagnosis and management.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
Same journal

How to do it in surgery: laparoscopic rectopexy.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
Same journal

Immunodeficiency syndromes and recurrent infection.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
Same journal

Asthma: the role of fluticasone propionate.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
Same journal

Health economics: a beginner's guide.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
See all related articles

Carpal tunnel decompression surgery is common, but complications can occur. While endoscopic techniques aim to reduce issues, they also present their own set of potential complications.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Neurosurgery
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures

Background:

  • Carpal tunnel decompression is a frequently performed surgical procedure.
  • While generally successful, the surgery is associated with known complications.
  • Patient satisfaction is typically high, but complication rates remain a concern.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the complication profile of traditional versus new endoscopic carpal tunnel decompression techniques.
  • To compare the incidence of complications associated with different surgical approaches for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on carpal tunnel decompression outcomes.
  • Analysis of complication rates reported for open and endoscopic surgical methods.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative assessment of surgical technique-specific adverse events.

    • Main Results:

    • Traditional carpal tunnel release has established complication risks.
    • Endoscopic techniques are introduced with claims of reduced complication incidence.
    • However, endoscopic methods introduce a distinct set of potential complications.

    Conclusions:

    • Both traditional and endoscopic carpal tunnel decompression carry risks.
    • The choice of surgical technique requires careful consideration of potential complications.
    • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the safety and efficacy of novel endoscopic approaches.