Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Equipment management risk rating system based on engineering endpoints.

P J James1

  • 1North Memorial Health Care, Robbinsdale, Minnesota, USA.

Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology
|April 9, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Control of sheep flystrike: what's been tried in the past and where to from here.

Australian veterinary journal·2021
Same author

Prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of Australian-registered insecticide formulations against Old World screwworm (Chrysomya bezziana) infestation.

Australian veterinary journal·2017
Same author

Primary hip and knee arthroplasty in a temporary operating theatre is associated with a significant increase in deep periprosthetic infection.

The bone & joint journal·2017
Same author

A comparison of lateral release rates in fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology·2015
Same author

Control of the sheep blowfly in Australia and New Zealand--are we there yet?

International journal for parasitology·2014
Same author

A prospective randomised study comparing rotating platform and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty in a cruciate substituting design--outcomes at two year follow-up.

The Knee·2013

This new equipment management system rates risks based on intrinsic device factors and engineering endpoints, improving accuracy over traditional outcome-based methods.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Device Management
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Current equipment management risk ratings often rely on subjective outcome endpoints.
  • This can lead to ambiguity in assessing device safety and efficacy.
  • A more objective approach is needed for effective medical equipment risk management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel equipment management risk ratings system.
  • To base risk classifications on intrinsic device risks (physical, clinical, technical).
  • To utilize engineering endpoints for a more objective risk assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Categorizing intrinsic device risks into physical, clinical, and technical aspects.
  • Implementing an incoming equipment assessment process.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Basing the risk rating system on verifiable engineering endpoints (e.g., clinical measurements, energy delivery).

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed system classifies risks based on inherent device properties.
    • Risk ratings are determined by objective engineering endpoints, not subjective outcomes.
    • This approach reduces ambiguity in risk evaluation for medical equipment.

    Conclusions:

    • The outlined risk ratings system offers a more precise method for equipment management.
    • Focusing on intrinsic risks and engineering endpoints enhances the objectivity of risk assessment.
    • This system provides a foundation for improved medical device safety and operational integrity.