Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Metrical segmentation in Dutch: vowel quality or stress?

H Quené1, M L Koster

  • 1Utrecht Institute for Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Hugo.Quene@let.uu.nl

Language and Speech
|April 9, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prosodic boundaries in alaryngeal speech.

Clinical linguistics & phonetics·2008
Same author

"Pitch" accent in alaryngeal speech.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2003
Same author

Segment durations and accent as cues to word segmentation in Dutch.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1993
Same author

Blepharospasm--patient's perspective.

Advances in neurology·1988
Same journal

Prominence and Grouping in Papuan Malay Prosody Perception.

Language and speech·2026
Same journal

Perceptual Tuning to Structure: Integrating the Phonetic Detail of Coarticulatory Vowel Nasalization With Prosodic and Information Structure.

Language and speech·2026
Same journal

An Investigation of the Phonetic Variation of the Word-Initial /l/ and /n/ Across Regional Varieties of Mandarin.

Language and speech·2026
Same journal

How Much Do We Imitate in a Non-Native Language? Explicit Versus Implicit Imitation in L2 Speech.

Language and speech·2026
Same journal

Motivation, Anxiety, and Enjoyment in L2 Pronunciation: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study.

Language and speech·2026
Same journal

Allophonic Variation in L1 and L2 English Laterals: Evidence from L1 Japanese-L2 English Speakers.

Language and speech·2026
See all related articles

Dutch listeners do not use metrical segmentation to identify words, unlike English speakers. Instead, stress is a key acoustic cue for word segmentation in Dutch speech processing.

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Speech Perception
  • Phonology

Background:

  • English listeners segment continuous speech using metrically strong syllables.
  • Dutch and English share metrical properties but differ in acoustic salience and stress-vowel quality dependency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate the metrical segmentation strategy in Dutch listeners.
  • Determine if Dutch listeners rely on metrical cues or stress for word segmentation.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments using word-spotting tasks with Dutch monosyllabic words and disyllabic nonwords.
  • Manipulation of stress and vowel quality to assess their impact on word identification.

Main Results:

  • Stress significantly impacts Dutch listeners' ability and speed in spotting words.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Vowel quality shows a small effect on error scores but not on response latencies.
  • No evidence suggests Dutch listeners apply a metrical segmentation strategy.

    • Conclusions:

    • Dutch listeners do not employ a metrical segmentation strategy for word identification.
    • Speech segmentation strategies are influenced by language-specific phonological and lexical regularities.
    • Stress, rather than metrical strength, appears to be a primary cue for Dutch word segmentation.