Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gender differences on Internet cancer support groups.

P Klemm1, M Hurst, S L Dearholt

  • 1Klemmpa@udel.edu

Computers in Nursing
|April 9, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Focus on "osteoporosis"-new information on physical training, therapy, and comprehensive care].

Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Real-world treatment sequencing and survival in previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma patients receiving nivolumab monotherapy: a UK retrospective cohort study.

BMC cancer·2022
Same author

Bronchiectasis is associated with delayed diagnosis and adverse outcomes in the New Zealand Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders cohort study.

Clinical and experimental immunology·2021
Same author

[Paget's disease of bone-a current review of clinical aspects, diagnostics and treatment].

Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie·2020
Same author

Maternal high-fat diet during lactation reprograms the dopaminergic circuitry in mice.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2020
Same author

Comparison of 3-day and 7-day recall periods for food consumption reference values in foodborne disease outbreak investigations.

Epidemiology and infection·2019
Same journal

Medi-Sim Multimedia: AACN Critical Care-Hematological System.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

Managing Information in Healthcare: Concepts and Cases.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

Using online learning in a traditional face-to-face environment.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

The "big bang" implementation: not for the faint of heart.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

Homebound older adults' experiences with the Internet and e-mail.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

A study of factors related to the use of online resources by nurse educators.

Computers in nursing·2002
See all related articles

Online cancer support groups (CSGs) show gender-specific communication patterns. Men share more information, while women offer more support, highlighting differences in online cancer coping strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Sociology
  • Health Communication

Background:

  • Community-based cancer support groups (CSGs) are vital for coping with cancer.
  • Internet cancer support groups (ICSGs) offer a modern alternative to traditional CSGs.
  • Understanding communication dynamics in ICSGs is crucial for optimizing support.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate response category differences in single-gender versus mixed-gender ICSGs.
  • To compare response categories between gender-specific ICSGs and mixed-gender ICSGs.
  • To identify how gender influences communication patterns within ICSGs.

Main Methods:

  • A line-by-line analysis of postings from prostate, breast, and mixed ICSGs was conducted.
  • Participant responses were systematically categorized.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical analysis (chi-squared test) was used to compare categorical responses by gender.

    • Main Results:

    • Four main response categories (information, encouragement, personal opinion, personal experience) comprised ~80% of all responses.
    • Prostate ICSGs prioritized information giving/seeking, while breast ICSGs focused on personal experience.
    • Men predominantly provided information, whereas women offered more encouragement and support; response categories significantly differed by gender (P < .0001).

    Conclusions:

    • Response categories in ICSGs vary significantly based on gender composition.
    • Specific communication patterns emerge in gender-specific versus mixed-gender online cancer support.
    • Efforts should focus on including underserved populations in ICSGs, with future research exploring links to mental health and quality of life.